Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Williams
| Decision Date | 05 June 2006 |
| Docket Number | No. 05-465.,05-465. |
| Parties | MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC. v. WILLIAMS et al. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Carter G. Phillips argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Richard D. Bernstein, Juan P. Morillo, and Steven T. Cottreau.
Howard W. Foster argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were John E. Floyd, Joshua F. Thorpe, Ronan P. Doherty, Bobby Lee Cook, and Matthew Thames.
Malcolm L. Stewart argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging affirmance. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Clement, Assistant Attorney General Fisher, Deputy Solicitor General Dreeben, and Sangita K. Rao.*
The writ of certiorari limited to Question 1 presented by the petition, granted at 546 U. S. 1075 (2005), is dismissed as improvidently granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp., ante, p. 451.
It is so ordered.
* Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. by Beth S. Brinkmann, Seth M. Galanter, Alison Tucher, Robin S. Conrad, and Amar D. Sarwal; and for the National Association of Manufacturers et al. by Michael J. Mueller, Jan S. Amundson, and Quentin Riegel.
Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the Immigration Political Action Committee et al. by Barnaby W. Zall; and for the National Association of Shareholder and Consumer Attorneys by Kevin P. Roddy and G. Robert Blakey.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Cunningham v. Offshore Specialty Fabrications
...granted" and the case was remanded to the Eleventh Circuit for consideration in light of Anza. Mohawk Indus, v. Williams, 547 U.S. 516, 126 S.Ct. 2016, 164 L.Ed.2d 776 (2006). Thereafter, the Eleventh Circuit reinstated and modified in part its previous opinion. Williams v. Mohawk Indus., 4......
-
Williams v. Mohawk Industries, Inc.
...of Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corporation, 547 U.S. 451, 126 S.Ct. 1991, 164 L.Ed.2d 720 (2006). Mohawk Indus., Inc. v. Williams, 547 U.S. 516, 126 S.Ct. 2016, 164 L.Ed.2d 776 (2006). We again concluded that the claims of unjust enrichment failed and that the employees stated claims of rack......
-
Whitman v. Department of Transportation
... ... Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of Md., 535 U. S. 635, 642 (2002) (holding that ... ...