Mole v. City of Durham

Decision Date17 May 2022
Docket Number394PA21-1
Citation871 S.E.2d 815 (Mem)
Parties MOLE v. CITY OF DURHAM
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

J. Michael McGuinness, Attorney at Law, Elizabethtown, For Mole, Michael.

M. Travis Payne, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Mole, Michael.

Henry W. Sappenfield, Attorney at Law, Durham, For The City of Durham.

Michele L. Livingstone, Attorney at Law, For The City of Durham.

Norris Arden Adams, II, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For National Fraternal Order of Police and the State of North Carolina Fraternal Order of Police.

Caitlin H. Walton, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For National Fraternal Order of Police and the State of North Carolina Fraternal Order of Police.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of May 2022 by National Fraternal Order of Police and the State of North Carolina Fraternal Order of Police for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of May 2022."

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT