Monfort of Colorado v. Husson

Decision Date08 May 1986
Citation725 P.2d 67
Docket Number85CA1210
PartiesMONFORT OF COLORADO, and Home Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Robert HUSSON, Director of the Division of Labor, Mike L. Baca, the Industrial Commission of the State of Colorado and William E. Milton, Respondents. . I
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
20 cases
  • Allee v. Contractors, Inc.
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • 27 Noviembre 1989
    ...107 (Colo.App.1986) (temporary disability benefits payable until employee reaches maximum medical improvement); Monfort of Colorado v. Husson, 725 P.2d 67 (Colo.App.1986) (temporary total disability benefits not payable after client reached maximum medical improvement); Golden Age Manor v. ......
  • Boroff v. Mail-Well Envelope Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • 23 Abril 1991
    ...because, among other reasons, the termination was his own fault and he was therefore precluded from benefits under Monfort of Colo. v. Husson, 725 P.2d 67 (Colo.App.1986)." R.Vol. I, tab 28, Affidavit of Pamela Musgrave. In Monfort of Colo. v. Husson, 725 P.2d at 69, the Colorado Court of A......
  • PDM Molding, Inc. v. Stanberg, 94SC394
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • 26 Junio 1995
    ...for fault, Stanberg was not eligible for temporary total disability benefits under the rule established in Monfort of Colorado v. Husson, 725 P.2d 67 (Colo.App.1986). The ICAO determined that Monfort did not control Stanberg's claim here because Monfort was limited to circumstances wherein ......
  • Colorado Springs Disposal v. INDUST. CLAIM, No. 01CA0464.
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • 28 Marzo 2002
    ...in regular employment, but terminated for drinking and unexcused absences after returning to modified employment), and Monfort v. Husson, 725 P.2d 67, 68 (Colo.App.1986)(because no modified employment was available after injury, claimant was terminated, then began work for subsequent employ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT