Monroe v. City of Woodville, Miss., 88-4433

Decision Date22 March 1990
Docket NumberNo. 88-4433,88-4433
Citation897 F.2d 763
PartiesJohn MONROE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF WOODVILLE, MISSISSIPPI, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion Aug. 30, 1989, 5th Cir. 881 F.2d 1327)

Before GEE, GARZA and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Having considered appellants' motion for rehearing and decided that it is in part well-taken, the court herewith revises part A and the first sentence of part B of the opinion as follows: 1

A. Political Cohesion

Based on the evidence before it, the district court concluded that the appellants did not prove political cohesion among the black voters in Woodville. That the appellants had the burden of proof on this issue is not disputed. See Overton, 871 F.2d 529, 543 (Jones, J., concurring). Appellants assert that this finding embodies an error of law as well as fact. They note that the district court accepted the parties' stipulation that both whites and blacks in Woodville generally vote along racial lines. According to appellants, Thornburg v. Gingles, Campos v. City of Baytown, 840 F.2d 1240 (5th Cir.1988), and Citizens for a Better Gretna v. City of Gretna, 834 F.2d 496 (5th Cir.1987), hold that if the district court finds that a minority group votes as a bloc for minority candidates, political cohesion within the minority group is proven even if the district court finds significant and consistent crossover voting by the black electorate. We disagree.

Thornburg does recognize that establishing "that a significant number of minority group members usually vote for the same candidates is one way of proving political cohesiveness...." 106 S.Ct. 2769-70 (emphasis added). Statistical proof of political cohesion is likely to be the most persuasive form of evidence, although other evidence may also establish this phenomenon. Brewer, 876 F.2d 448, 453 (lay testimony from members of the community on political cohesion might be sufficient). Nevertheless, courts must carefully examine statistical evidence of racial bloc voting to determine its relevance and probativeness to a finding of political cohesiveness. Accord Overton v. City of Austin, 871 F.2d 529.

Political cohesion is required under Thornburg for a fundamental reason. As the Court said, "if the minority group is not politically cohesive, it cannot be said that the selection of a multimember electoral structure thwarts distinctive minority interests." Thornburg 106 S.Ct. at 2767.

We turn, then, to the district court's finding that Woodville's blacks are not politically cohesive. The ambit of appellate review of this fact is limited. A finding is clearly erroneous when "although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 573, 105 S.Ct. 1504, 1511, 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985) (quoting United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395, 68 S.Ct. 525, 542, 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948)).

If the district court's account of the evidence is plausible in light of the record viewed in its entirety, the court of appeals may not reverse it even though convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • League of United Latin American Citizens, Council No. 4434 v. Clements
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • January 27, 1993
    ...behind or coalesce around particular candidates and issues. See Monroe v. City of Woodville, 881 F.2d 1327, 1331 (5th Cir.1989), modified, 897 F.2d 763, cert. denied, 498 U.S. 822, 111 S.Ct. 71, 112 L.Ed.2d 45 (1990). The term racially polarized voting, on the other hand, describes an elect......
  • Kumar v. Frisco Indep. Sch. Dist.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Texas
    • August 4, 2020
    ...around particular candidates and issues." Id. at 744 (citing Monroe v. City of Woodville , 881 F.2d 1327, 1331 (5th Cir. 1989), modified , 897 F.2d 763, cert. denied , 498 U.S. 822, 111 S.Ct. 71, 112 L.Ed.2d 45 (1990) ). On the other hand, RPV "describes an electorate in which white voters ......
  • Luna v. Cnty. of Kern
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • February 23, 2018
    ...evidence of racially polarized voting, though other non-statistical evidence may establish this factor as well. Monroe v. City of Woodville , 897 F.2d 763, 764 (5th Cir. 1990) ("Statistical proof of political cohesion is likely to be the most persuasive form of evidence, although other evid......
  • Rodriguez v. Harris Cnty., Civil Action No. 4:11–2907.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • August 1, 2013
    ...see infra Part III.C other evidence may also establish this second Gingles factor. LULAC III, 986 F.2d at 743;Monroe v. City of Woodville, 897 F.2d 763, 764 (5th Cir.1990) (“Statistical proof of political cohesion is likely to be the most persuasive form of evidence, although other evidence......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT