Monsour v. Balk, 97-00538

Decision Date23 January 1998
Docket NumberNo. 97-00538,97-00538
Citation705 So.2d 968
Parties23 Fla. L. Weekly D366 Dr. Robert G. MONSOUR, Appellant, v. Bruce BALK, A.I.A., P.A., Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Rex A. Roten of Livingston, Patterson, Strickland & Weiner, P.A., Sarasota, for Appellant.

Kim W. Munch of Munch and Munch, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

PARKER, Chief Judge.

Dr. Monsour seeks review of the final order denying his motion for relief from judgment in this contract case. Dr. Monsour argues that the default judgment that was entered against him is void because of insufficient process of service. We agree and reverse because the trial court failed to determine whether it had jurisdiction to enter a default judgment due to insufficient service of process.

Bruce Balk, A.I.A., P.A. (Balk) filed a complaint against three doctors and a hotel for breach of contract for failure to pay Balk for architectural services. Balk was unable to obtain service on the other defendants and attempted to obtain service on Dr. Monsour by serving his son, who lives in Sarasota.

Dr. Monsour lives in Pennsylvania where he practices medicine. The son alleges in his affidavit that the sheriff served the complaint on him at his personal residence. When the son realized the mistake the sheriff had made, he informed Balk that he did not represent any of the people involved in this contract and that Balk needed to serve his father in Pennsylvania. Balk allegedly told the son that he would have Dr. Monsour served in Pennsylvania. Instead, Balk filed a motion for default.

First, the trial court erred by not conducting an evidentiary hearing to determine whether or not the facts in the affidavits could be proven. See Fern, Ltd. v. Road Legends, Inc., 698 So.2d 364, 365 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (Court required to hold evidentiary hearing in face of allegations in affidavit of defendant, because if proven would establish that person served was not qualified to accept service for defendant).

If the allegations in Dr. Monsour's and his son's affidavits are true, Balk did not obtain service on Dr. Monsour. Balk argues that he obtained substituted service by serving Dr. Monsour's son. Section 48.031(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1995), provides for service of process by delivery to the person at their regular abode with any person residing therein who is fifteen years or older. This does not apply because Dr. Monsour's regular place of abode is in Pennsylvania. Furthermore, Balk did not obtain service by service on an agent of a nonresident doing business in this state. Section 48.071, Florida Statutes (1995), sets forth the procedure for serving someone who does business in Florida, but has his principal place of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Dzidzovic
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 22 Junio 2018
    ...the other party from addressing whether the order should be vacated as the product of mistake under rule 1.540(b) ); Monsour v. Balk, 705 So.2d 968, 969 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (holding that trial court erred in denying motion for relief from judgment without "conducting an evidentiary hearing t......
  • Avi–isaac v. Bank
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 2 Marzo 2011
    ...to vacate the default final judgment, the trial court effectively denied them an opportunity to be heard.” Id. In Monsour v. Balk, 705 So.2d 968, 969 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), this court addressed the failure to hold an evidentiary hearing on a motion for relief from judgment. This court determin......
  • SOUTHEASTERN TERMITE AND PEST v. Ones, 4D01-253.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 5 Septiembre 2001
    ...an issue of fact as to receipt of notice, therefore, the trial court was required to hold an evidentiary hearing); Monsour v. Balk, 705 So.2d 968, 970 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (stating that the affidavit supporting defendant's motion for relief from judgment, if true, would establish that defenda......
  • Arcila v. Bac Home Loans Servicing, L.P.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 6 Agosto 2014
    ...hearing. See, e.g.,Avi–Isaac v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 59 So.3d 174, 177 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011); see also Monsour v. Bruce Balk, A.I.A., P.A., 705 So.2d 968, 969 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (holding that trial court erred in denying motion for relief from judgment alleging defective service without “co......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT