Montalvo v. Cedeno

Decision Date27 March 2019
Docket Number2017–03586,Index No. 507430/16
Parties Luis G. MONTALVO, Respondent, v. Gianni CEDENO, et al., Appellants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

170 A.D.3d 1166
96 N.Y.S.3d 638

Luis G. MONTALVO, Respondent,
v.
Gianni CEDENO, et al., Appellants.

2017–03586
Index No. 507430/16

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Argued—December 10, 2018
March 27, 2019


Nicolini, Paradise, Ferretti & Sabella, PLLC, Mineola, N.Y. (Alyssa L. Garone of counsel), for appellants.

Omrani & Taub, P.C., New York, N.Y. (James L. Forde of counsel), for respondent.

RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, ROBERT J. MILLER, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

170 A.D.3d 1166

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff allegedly was injured when his vehicle was struck in the rear by the defendants' vehicle at or near a T-intersection. The plaintiff thereafter commenced this action against the defendants to recover damages for personal injuries. After joinder of issue, but before any discovery was conducted, the plaintiff moved for summary judgment on the

170 A.D.3d 1167

issue of liability. The defendants opposed the motion. The Supreme Court granted the plaintiff's motion, and the defendants appeal.

A plaintiff in a negligence action moving for summary judgment on the issue of liability must establish, prima facie, that the defendants breached a duty owed to the plaintiff and that the defendants' negligence was a proximate cause of the alleged injuries (see Rodriguez v. City of New York , 31 N.Y.3d 312, 76 N.Y.S.3d 898, 101 N.E.3d 366 ; Tsyganash v. Auto Mall Fleet Mgt., Inc. , 163 A.D.3d 1033, 1033–1034, 83 N.Y.S.3d 74 ). "A driver of a vehicle approaching another vehicle from the rear is required to maintain a reasonably safe distance and rate of speed under the prevailing conditions to avoid colliding with the other vehicle" (

Nsiah–Ababio v. Hunter , 78 A.D.3d 672, 672, 913 N.Y.S.2d 659 ; see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1129[a] ). Thus, a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
36 cases
  • Arrospide v. Murphy
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • October 30, 2019
    ...rear vehicle and imposes a duty on that operator to come forward with a non-negligent explanation for the collision (Montalvo v. Cedeno, 170 A.D.3d 1166, 96 N.Y.S.3d 638 [2d Dept. 2019],McLaughlin v Lunn, 137 A.D.3d 757, 26 N.Y.S.3d 338 [2d Dept 2016]; Cheow v Cheng Lin Jin, 121 A.D.3d 1058......
  • Lax v. City University of New York
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • August 25, 2022
  • Arrospide v. Murphy
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • October 30, 2019
    ... ... that operator to come forward with a non-negligent ... explanation for the collision (Montalvo v. Cedeno, ... 170 A.D.3d 1166, 96 N.Y.S.3d 638 [2d Dept. 2019], ... McLaughlin v Lunn, 137 A.D.3d 757, 26N.Y.S.3d338 [2d ... Dept 2016]; ... ...
  • Geico Gen. Ins. Co. v. The Town of Islip
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • November 18, 2020
    ...rear vehicle and imposes a duty on that operator to come forward with a non-negligent explanation for the collision (Montalvo v Cedeno, 170 A.D.3d 1166, 96 N.Y.S.3d 638 [2d Dept2019]; McLaughlin v Lunn, 137 A.D.3d 757, 26 N.Y.S.3d 338 [2d Dept2016]; Cheow v Cheng Lin Jin, 121 A.D.3d 1058, 9......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT