Montonez v. State, 97-01636
| Decision Date | 13 January 1999 |
| Docket Number | No. 97-01636,97-01636 |
| Citation | 724 So.2d 650 |
| Parties | José A. MONTONEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Terri L. Backhus of Backhus & Izakowitz, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
Appellant challenges the revocation of his community control and resulting sentence of forty-seven months' incarceration for burglary of a dwelling, third degree grand theft, and grand theft of a firearm. We find no merit in the three issues raised and affirm the revocation and sentence. While the affidavit and amended affidavit of violation of community control allege numerous violations of condition (3) (moving from his approved residence without the consent of his probation officer), condition (9) (failing to report to his community control officer), and condition (12) (failing to remain confined to his approved residence), the revocation order fails to specify which conditions were violated. We therefore remand this case for entry of an order of revocation of community control which delineates the specific conditions appellant was found to have violated. See Dietz v. State, 534 So.2d 808 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).
Affirmed; remanded with instructions.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Tummings v. Francois
-
Jacobs v. State, 2D00-1461.
...it must enter a proper written order that sets forth the conditions the trial court finds were violated. See Montonez v. State, 724 So.2d 650, 651 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Donley v. State, 557 So.2d 943, 945 (Fla. 2d DCA Reversed and remanded for further proceedings. SILBERMAN and KELLY, JJ., Co......
- Lowman v. Lowman, No. 97-04710
-
Williams v. State, Case No. 2D18-2987
...remand for the entry of an order that delineates the specific conditions Williams was found to have violated. See Montonez v. State, 724 So. 2d 650, 651 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).Affirmed and remanded with instructions. NORTHCUTT and BLACK, JJ., Concur.1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct......