Moody v. Gilbert, 17777

Decision Date10 March 1952
Docket NumberNo. 17777,17777
Citation208 Ga. 784,69 S.E.2d 874
PartiesMOODY v. GILBERT.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Henry M. Hatcher, Jr., Herbert Johnson and R. R. Rhudy, all of Atlanta, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance, for defendant in error.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

CANDLER, Justice.

Where, as here, the judgment sought to be reviewed is one by the judge of a superior court fixing the custody of a minor child, and the record shows that the judge, before rendering the judgment complained of, referred the matter of custody to the juvenile court for investigation, report and recommendation, his judgment will be reversed when the record shows, as it does in this case, that it is based, in part at least, upon information obtained from such report. See, in this connection, Alford v. Alford, 190 Ga. 562, 9 S.E.2d 895; Kilgore v. Tiller, 194 Ga. 527, 22 S.E.2d 150; Everett v. Sharpe, 207 Ga. 502, 504, 63 S.E.2d 1; Sheppard v. Sheppard, 208 Ga. 422(3), 67 S.E.2d 131. Fundamental to our system of jurisprudence is the right of a party litigant to be confronted with those who testify against him; and respect for judgments and decrees will not survive its abrogation.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Kelley v. Kelley
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • December 18, 2007
    ...note 16, infra; Yearsley v. Yearsley, note 16, infra; Anderson v. Anderson, note 20, infra; Larson v. Larson, note 16, infra; Moody v. Gilbert, note 16, infra; Roberts v. Roberts, note 16, infra; Fewel v. Fewel, note 16, infra; Roach v. Roach, note 16, infra; Lyle v. Eddy, note 16, infra; K......
  • Camp v. Camp
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • March 11, 1957
    ...Ga. 527, 22 S.E.2d 150, Everett v. Sharpe, 207 Ga. 502, 63 S.E.2d 1, Sheppard v. Sheppard, 208 Ga. 422, 67 S.E.2d 131, and Moody v. Gilbert, 208 Ga. 784, 69 S.E.2d 874, made it crystal clear that the trial courts of the State could not consider reports of the Welfare Departments of the coun......
  • Tucker v. Tucker
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • February 6, 1986
    ...252 (1933); Smith v. Smith, 209 Wis. 605, 245 N.W. 644 (1932). Fewel v. Fewel, 23 Cal.2d 431, 144 P.2d 592 (1943); Moody v. Gilbert, 208 Ga. 784, 69 S.E.2d 874 (1952); Yearsley v. Yearsley, 94 Idaho 667, 496 P.2d 666 (1972). See 27B C.J.S., Divorce § 317(8)a. See also Rosier v. Rosier, 162 ......
  • Collins v. Collins
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • September 24, 1984
    ...upon which the guardian or investigator makes his recommendation. See, e.g., Bass v. Bass, 437 P.2d 324 (Alaska 1968); Moody v. Gilbert, 208 Ga. 784, 69 S.E.2d 874 (1952); Yearsley v. Yearsley, 94 Idaho 667, 496 P.2d 666 (1972); Aylor v. Aylor, 173 Colo. 294, 478 P.2d 302 (1970); Rohrbaugh ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT