Moody v. Moody, 97-4784

Decision Date13 February 1998
Docket NumberNo. 97-4784,97-4784
Citation705 So.2d 708
PartiesSarah MOODY, Petitioner, v. Michael R. MOODY, Respondent.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Beverly B. Parker, Jacksonville Area Legal Aid, Inc., for petitioner.

Alexa K. Alvarez, of Alvarez & Page, Fernandina Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Sarah Moody petitions this court for a writ of mandamus. She and her husband are currently parties to a dissolution action in Nassau County. Mrs. Moody has moved for the disqualification of the presiding judge and the motion has been pending for over four months.

A writ of mandamus may issue to require a timely ruling on a matter pending before a lower tribunal. See Flagship National Bank v. Testa, 429 So.2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). The purpose of the writ is not to require a particular outcome, only that action be taken. Kramp v. Fagan, 568 So.2d 479 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). We note that Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.160(e) contemplates an "immediate ruling" on a motion for judicial disqualification.

The petition for writ of mandamus is granted and the Honorable Bill Parsons is directed to render an order on the motion for his disqualification within ten days of issuance of this opinion.

BARFIELD, C.J., and WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Wells v. Castro
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 10 Julio 2013
    ...Mar. 21, 2013). A writ of mandamus may issue to require a timely ruling on a matter pending before a lower tribunal. Moody v. Moody, 705 So.2d 708 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). After the arbitrator entered the Remand Order, the trial court gave Castro ninety days to file a motion to correct, modify ......
  • Sr Acquisitions-Florida City, LLC v. San Remo Homes At Florida City, LLC
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 30 Noviembre 2011
    ...A writ of mandamus from this Court directs the trial court to take action, but does not decide the merits. See Moody v. Moody, 705 So.2d 708, 708 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). A trial court has broad discretion to manage its docket, but must do so within the confines of governing statutes and rules ......
  • Polley v. Gardner
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 18 Octubre 2012
    ...motion.1 “A writ of mandamus may issue to require a timely ruling on a matter pending before a lower tribunal.” Moody v. Moody, 705 So.2d 708 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). In order to be entitled to mandamus, the petitioners must allege a violation of a clear legal right and the breach of an indispu......
  • DWH v. Dept. of Children & Families, 5D02-556.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 26 Abril 2002
    ...judge to grant the motion to disqualify himself; mandamus does not lie to compel the trial court to rule a certain way. Moody v. Moody, 705 So.2d 708 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Finally, we cannot order the trial judge or the Department to supply the petitioner with "all records" and "any and all ......
1 books & journal articles
  • Enforcement of orders and judgments
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Florida Family Law and Practice - Volume 1
    • 30 Abril 2022
    ...comply. Gross receipts of business in which husband owned roughly a third interest not sufficient basis for valuation); Moody v. Moody, 705 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (mother denied due process where change of custody used to enforce restriction that mother not smoke in front of child a......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT