Mooney v. State
Decision Date | 17 December 2003 |
Docket Number | No. 4D03-3000.,4D03-3000. |
Citation | 864 So.2d 60 |
Parties | Michael MOONEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Richard I. Bellis of the Law Office of Richard I. Bellis, Plantation, for appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph A. Tringali, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
This Court per curiam affirmed Mooney's appeal of his conviction and sentence. Mooney v. State, 642 So.2d 763 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). Mooney now appeals the trial court's denial of his Rule 3.800 motion to correct sentence based on a scoresheet miscalculation. We affirm the trial court's denial of Mooney's motion.
Here, the trial court departed from the guidelines and imposed a life sentence for Mooney's charge of burglary with a battery. The scoresheet prepared for Mooney's sentencing presented the recommended guideline range for his offense as nine to twelve years. The trial court departed from these guidelines and sentenced Mooney to life in prison on the basis that Mooney had the apparent ability to carry out his threat to kill the victim. The scoresheet the trial court relied on in sentencing Mooney was in error as the sentencing range should have been 5.5 to 7 years rather than 9 to 12 years due to the improper classification of Mooney's prior offenses.
Here, the sentence imposed by the trial court was not illegal. Despite the fact that the sentence imposed by the trial court was not illegal, a rule 3.800 motion is also a proper vehicle to raise a scoresheet miscalculation. See Williamson v. State, 683 So.2d 193, 193-94 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
( ); Baldwin v. State, 679 So.2d 1193, 1194 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) ( )(citation omitted).
Although the scoresheet miscalculation was properly brought before this Court, the record demonstrates that the trial court would have imposed the same sentence despite the scoresheet miscalculation, and thus, the error was harmless. See Cardali v. State, 794 So.2d 719, 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
; Rubin v. State, 734 So.2d 1089, 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Hines v. State, 587 So.2d 620, 621 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Here, the trial court stated that it was departing because Mooney ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Tundidor v. State, SC14–2276
...demonstrated that the trial court would have imposed the same sentence of 53 months with a corrected scoresheet); Mooney v. State , 864 So.2d 60, 61–62 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (affirming as harmless the denial of a claim of scoresheet calculation error because the record demonstrated that the d......
-
State v. Anderson
...Higgs v. State, 470 So.2d 75, 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)), approved on other grounds, 586 So.2d 340 (Fla.1991); see, e.g., Mooney v. State, 864 So.2d 60, 62 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (affirming as harmless the denial of a claim of scoresheet calculation error because the record demonstrated that the d......
-
Page v. State
...DCA 2002); Williams v. State, 734 So.2d 1113 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Williams v. State, 925 So.2d 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Mooney v.. State, 864 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Harris v. State, 789 So.2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).LaROSE, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., ...
-
Mooney v. State , 4D11–286.
...nine and twelve years, but a corrected guidelines scoresheet recommended a sentence between five and seven years. See Mooney v. State, 864 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (concluding that the scoresheet error was harmless based on the ...