Moore v. City of Waco
Decision Date | 10 June 1892 |
Citation | 20 S.W. 61 |
Parties | MOORE <I>et al.</I> v. CITY OF WACO <I>et al.</I> |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Appeal from district court, McLennan county; L. W. GOODRICH, Judge.
Trespass to try title by Ed Moore, as guardian of Maria E. Woodward Wortham against the city of Waco and others. Plaintiff obtained judgment for an estate for life. Plaintiff and the city of Waco and other defendants appeal. Reversed.
Wm. M. Flournoy, for appellant Ed Moore. E. A. McKenney, for appellants E. R. Wortham, W. T. Montgomery, and Montgomery minors. John F. Flint, for appellant City of Waco. Herring & Kelley, for appellees J. A. Leftwich, guardian, and Susan A. Leftwich.
This is an agreed case and is stated as follows by the parties: "This is an action of trespass to try title for the recovery of an acre of land in the city of Waco, brought by Ed Moore, as guardian of Maria E. Woodward Wortham, who was for years prior to 19th June, 1878, and still is, a non compos mentis, and beyond the hope of recovery. This suit was brought in the district court of McLennan county on 29th of August, 1891, against the city of Waco, and against E. R. Wortham, who was one of the children of said Maria E. Woodward Wortham, and against the other appellees herein, who were the children of a deceased daughter and a deceased son of said Maria E. Woodward Wortham. All the defendants pleaded "not guilty," and the city of Waco also pleaded the statute of limitation of five years. The defendant E. R. Wortham, and those claiming under the deceased daughter, Ann Maria Montgomery, also set up specially that the deed hereinafter quoted, under the circumstances surrounding the parties at the date of its execution, passed the whole title in the property to the children of said Maria, who were E. R. Wortham, N. J. Wortham, and Ann Maria Montgomery. The minor children of said Ann Maria Montgomery were represented herein by their guardian and father, William F. Montgomery, who also appeared for himself. The minor children of N. J. Wortham, deceased, were represented herein by their guardian, J. A. Leftwich, who had intermarried with the widow of said N. J. Wortham, deceased, who died in 1885. Said Leftwich and wife were also parties herein. There were other parties to the suit, but they were disposed of in such a way by the decree that their rights are not involved in this appeal, as all parties were satisfied therewith. Trial was had on December __, 1891, and judgment rendered in plaintiff's favor for an estate for life in said land, and that she recover said land as against the defendants, who are appellees herein. The plaintiff and the city of Waco and E. R. Wortham and the minor children of N. J. Wortham, by their guardian and their mother, Susan A. Leftwich, and all the children of Ann Maria Montgomery, (the minors being represented by their guardian,) and their father, W. F. Montgomery, gave notice of appeal, which in due course was duly perfected, and they have assigned errors.
One of the questions invoked upon this appeal is the proper construction of the following deed, which was introduced in evidence: The deed was duly acknowledged same day and was duly recorded in McLennan county on 22d ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hall v. Rawls
...beneficiary under a passive trust and inferentially support our statement respecting title: 42 Tex.Jur. 708 (Sec. 94); Moore v. City of Waco, 85 Tex. 206, 20 S.W. 61; Brown v. Harris, 7 Tex.Civ.App. 664, 27 S.W. 45; Tinsley v. Magnolia Park Co., Tex.Civ.App., 59 S.W. 629; Bankers Life Co. v......
-
Paul v. Houston Oil Co. of Texas
...`The habendum may be entirely rejected if repugnant to the other clauses of the conveyance.' Devl. Deeds, § 213." See Moore v. City of Waco, 85 Tex. 206, 20 S.W. 61, 63. "The dominant purpose in construing a deed is to ascertain the intention of the parties as expressed in the deed itself; ......
-
Webster v. International & G. N. Ry. Co.
...& T. C. Ry. Co., 180 S. W. 625; Kingsley v. Kerr, 135 S. W. 161; Small v. McMurphy, 11 Tex. Civ. App. 409, 32 S. W. 788; Moore v. City of Waco, 85 Tex. 206, 20 S. W. 61; Stanley v. Schwalby, 147 U. S. 508, 13 Sup. Ct. 418, 37 L. Ed. 259; Norris v. City of Waco, 57 Tex. 635; Click v. Lamar C......
-
Anderson v. United States
...repugnance' of clauses in a conveyance, the granting clause prevails over the other provisions of the deed."); Moore v. City of Waco, 20 S.W. 61, 63 (Tex. 1892) (observing that the habendum clause may be rejected if it is repugnant to the other clauses of the deed). In Texas, railroad compa......