Moore v. Hillsborough County

Decision Date30 November 1923
Citation98 So. 505,86 Fla. 514
PartiesEarle G. MOORE, Appellant v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, in the State of Florida, C. T. Friend, D. R. Crum, John T. Gunn, O. A. Ayala, and W. T. Williams, Constituting and Being the Board of County Commissioners of Hillsborough County, State of Florida, Appellees.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hillsborough County; F. M. Robles, Judge.

COUNSEL

Gibbons & Gibbons, of Tampa, for appellant.

T. M. Shackleford, Jr., of Tampa, for appellees.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is therefore, considered, ordered, and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the circuit court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

TAYLOR, C.J., and WHITFIELD, ELLIS, BROWNE, WEST, and TERRELL, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Smith Bros. v. Williams
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • February 18, 1930
    ...act in determining the validity and effect of the various provisions of chapter 10145 that are challenged here. In Moore v. Hillsborough County, 86 Fla. 514, 98 So. 505, decided in 1923, an injunction was sought to restrain county and its officers from paving, grading, and curbing a public ......
  • Smith Bros., Inc. v. Williams
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • August 6, 1930
    ...Affirmed. TERRELL, C.J., and WHITFIELD, EL LIS, STRUM, BROWN, and BUFORD, JJ., concur. CONCURRING WHITFIELD, J. In Moore v. Hillsborough County, 86 Fla. 514, 98 So. 505, the constitutionality of chapter 9316, Acts of 1923, which similar to chapter 10145, Acts of 1925, was sustained as again......
  • Mcmullen v. Newmar Corp.
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • August 4, 1930
    ... ... [129 So. 871] ... [100 Fla. 568] Appeal from Circuit Court, St. Lucie County; F ... M. Robles, judge ... COUNSEL ... G. P ... Garrett, of Orlando, ... validity of chapter 6458, Acts 1913, was more comprehensive ... than was the decision in Moore v. Hillsborough ... County, 86 Fla. 514, 98 So. 505, with reference to the ... validity of ... ...
  • Hillsborough County v. Highway Engineering & Const. Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • November 22, 1940
    ... ... certificates delivered by the county as agreed; that the ... certificates were issued under Chapter 9316, Laws of Florida, ... Acts of 1923, and that at the time of the contract the ... chapter authorizing the indebtedness had been declared ... constitutional in Earle G. Moore v. Hillsborough County, ... et al., 86 Fla. 514, 98 So. 505. It was further alleged ... that eventually, $10,554.18 was paid on the certificates, ... reducing the amount due to $4,181.05; that thereafter, on ... August 2, 1933, it was determined by the Supreme Court of ... Florida that ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT