Moore v. Leggette
| Decision Date | 22 November 1965 |
| Citation | 264 N.Y.S.2d 765,24 A.D.2d 891 |
| Parties | Fronia MOORE, Respondent, v. Sadie B. LEGGETTE, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Henry Wolfman, New York City, for appellant; Lewis I. Wolf, New York City, of counsel.
John E. Gillies, Farmingdale, Cooper, Abrams & Herman, Deer Park, for respondent; Hyman Herman, Deer Park, of counsel.
Before BRENNAN, Acting P. J., and HILL, RABIN, HOPKINS and BENJAMIN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action by plaintiff, a passenger, to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly suffered as a consequence of the negligence of defendant, as owner of a motor vehicle, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered March 24, 1965, which granted plaintiff's motion to strike out a partial defense in mitigation of damages (see 45 Misc.2d 603, 257 N.Y.S.2d 463).
Such defense alleged that (a) plaintiff had received $155 in full payment of medical expense reimbursement from defendant's insurance carrier under the terms of an automobile liability policy providing for the payment of the medical expenses of persons injured while passengers, allegedly incurred as a result of an accident; (b) defendant caused this sum to be paid, even though she was not legally liable therefor; (c) plaintiff executed a paper, releasing defendant from all liability by reason of medical expenses; and (d) by reason thereof plaintiff may not recover any medical expenses in the action.
Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied.
In our opinion, the learned Special Term erred in applying at bar the general rule that a wrongdoer may not claim the proceeds of an insurance policy in mitigation of damages. Such rule has no application where, as here, it appears that the defendant-wrongdoer himself has procured insurance for the benefit of the injured party (cf. Drinkwater v. Dinsmore, 80 N.Y. 390 [1880]; Healy v. Rennert, 9 N.Y.2d 202, 213 N.Y.S.2d 44, 173 N.E.2d 777 [1961]; Coyne v. Campbell, 11 N.Y.2d 372, 230 N.Y.S.2d 1, 183 N.E.2d 891 [1962]; and Cady v. City of New York, 14 N.Y.2d 660, 249 N.Y.S.2d 868, 198 N.E.2d 901).
At bar, it seems to us, contrary to the finding of the learned Special Term, that the equities of the situation are on the side of the defendant, the alleged wrongdoer. Where such wrongdoer is a person prudent enough to take out a policy of insurance to indemnify plaintiff and others from the hazards of the use of her automobile, for which she...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
North Star Reinsurance Corp. v. Continental Ins. Co.
...Oil Co., 84 A.D.2d 907, 446 N.Y.S.2d 669, revd. on dissent below 59 N.Y.2d 822, 464 N.Y.S.2d 744, 451 N.E.2d 491; Moore v. Leggette, 24 A.D.2d 891, 264 N.Y.S.2d 765, affd. 18 N.Y.2d 864, 276 N.Y.S.2d 118, 222 N.E.2d 737). In Meadvin, and Moore, the injured plaintiff sought to recover damage......
-
Mosca v. Pensky
...a third-party beneficiary of the insurance contract. (Silinsky v. State-Wide Ins. Co., 30 A.D.2d 1, 289 N.Y.S.2d 541; Moore v. Leggette, 24 A.D.2d 891, 264 N.Y.S.2d 765, affd. 18 N.Y.2d 864, 276 N.Y.S.2d 118, 222 N.E.2d 737). Nonetheless, even these limited statements regarding third-party ......
-
Silinsky v. State-Wide Ins. Co.
... ... It is the policy of this court to prevent double recoveries and avoid unjust enrichment by an injured person (Moore v. Leggette, 24 ... A.D.2d 891, 264 N.Y.S.2d 765, affd. 18 N.Y.2d 864, 276 N.Y.S.2d 118, 222 N.E.2d 737; cf. Wyman v. Allstate Insurance Company, ... ...
-
Grynbal v. Grynbal
...an alleged wrongdoer, he was 'a person prudent enough to take out a policy of insurance to indemnify plaintiff * * *' (Moore v. Leggette, 24 A.D.2d 891, 264 N.Y.S.2d 765, affd. 18 N.Y.2d 864, 276 N.Y.S.2d 118, 222 N.E.2d 737). The question, on which the parties part, and on which the learne......