Moore v. Mertz
Decision Date | 11 February 1905 |
Parties | MOORE et al. v. MERTZ. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Johnson County; W. J. Oxford, Judge.
Judicial settlement of the estate of Mrs. Beall H. Brown, deceased, in which Lelia Moore and others, as devisees and legatees, filed a protest to the inventory filed by C. W. Mertz as executor, and sought to require an additional inventory. From a judgment for the executor, protestants appealed to the district court, and from an order dismissing the appeal they further appeal. Reversed.
S. C. Padelford and Adams & Truelove, for appellants. H. P. Brown, D. W. Odell, and Ramsey & Odell, for appellee.
This was a proceeding begun in the county court of Johnson county in the matter of the estate of Mrs. Beall H. Brown, to require the executor to return a more perfect inventory of the property of said estate. Mrs. Beall H. Brown by her last will and testament named and constituted the defendant, C. W. Mertz, as executor of her estate, and devised all of her estate to her daughters, Mrs. Lelia Moore (née Brown) and Misses Fay, Floy, and Adriel Brown; and the will was duly probated, and C. W. Mertz accepted the trust as executor of her last will. He returned an inventory and appraisement of the property and list of claims, and the same was filed in the county court on the 24th day of October, 1899. The said devisees and legatees on the 6th day of March, 1900, filed in the county court in said estate their protest and exceptions, wherein they respectfully protest and except to the purported inventory, appraisement, and list of claims of the estate of the said Beall H. Brown, deceased, filed in said county court by said C. W. Mertz. The substance of the protest was that the executor had property and money in his possession which he had failed to embrace in the inventory, and it was sought to have the inventory corrected so as to include the same. This protest was tried in the county court on its merits, and protestants denied relief, and judgment rendered accordingly, from which judgment protestants appealed to the district court. The case was regularly carried to the district court on appeal. On the 15th day of December, 1903, the executor filed a general demurrer to plaintiffs' pleadings, which was sustained, and the plaintiffs then filed, under leave of the court, a trial amendment, which is as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rivera v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
...in all cases where the general objects of our system of probate law may require it." Green v. Rugely, supra; Moore v. Mertz, 38 Tex. Civ. App. 283, 85 S. W. 312; Dodson v. Wortham, 18 Tex. Civ. App. 666, 45 S. W. Under the laws of this state, a cause of action is property and an asset of th......