Moore v. Moore
| Decision Date | 19 December 1985 |
| Citation | 496 N.Y.S.2d 583,115 A.D.2d 894 |
| Parties | In the Matter of Sheila MOORE, Appellant, v. John MOORE, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Tavelli, McDermott & Seldin (Paul N. Tavelli, of counsel), Ithaca, for appellant.
John Moore, pro se.
Before MAHONEY, P.J., and KANE, CASEY and WEISS, JJ.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Tompkins County (Barrett, J.), entered October 15, 1984, which directed respondent to pay $5 per week for the support of his three infant children.
The parties were married on September 30, 1967. Three children were born of the marriage. Their respective ages at the time of the proceeding in Family Court were 13, 14 and 16. All of the children reside with petitioner. The parties executed a separation agreement, dated September 29, 1979, wherein respondent agreed to pay child support in the amount of $50 per week. The parties were divorced on December 16, 1980 and all issues of support were referred to Family Court. Respondent was paying support at the level of $63.25 per week for all three children until February 17, 1984 when his support payments ceased. No support has been paid since that date. Petitioner is employed as a secretary and her net income is $138.29 per week. Family Court determined the weekly expenses of the children for food, rent and other necessities to be approximately $250 per week. Respondent voluntarily left his job as a manager for a large grocery store chain when he was earning in excess of $20,000 per year to take a position as a store manager for a closely held corporation owned by his present wife. She pays respondent a $5,000 annual salary. After the filing of the petition herein, respondent and his present wife sold income property which had yielded $3,600 in rents for the previous year.
After a full hearing and complete financial disclosure, and after all the above facts were adopted by Family Court as findings of fact, the court ordered respondent to pay $5 per week for the support of his three children by his first marriage. This appeal by petitioner ensued.
Since the separation agreement was not incorporated or merged into the divorce decree, we shall treat the matter as a petition for child support de novo.
In Hickland v. Hickland, 39 N.Y.2d 1, 382 N.Y.S.2d 475, 346 N.E.2d 243, cert. denied 429 U.S. 941, 97 S.Ct. 357, 50 L.Ed.2d 310, it was held that where the reversal in a spouse's financial condition is brought about by the spouse's own actions or inactions, the court should not grant a downward modification of support payments. Here, the evidence indicated that the drastic reduction in respondent's income was attributable to his own behavior. At the time of the execution of the separation agreement and the divorce, respondent was earning...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Prill v. Mandell
...supra; Alfano v. Alfano, 151 A.D.2d 530, 542 N.Y.S.2d 313; Matter of Miller v. Miller, 137 A.D.2d 536, 524 N.Y.S.2d 276; Moore v. Moore, 115 A.D.2d 894, 496 N.Y.S.2d 583) or where he has hidden or refused to make his assets productive (see, Kay v. Kay, 37 N.Y.2d 632, 376 N.Y.S.2d 443, 339 N......
-
Southwick v. Southwick, 1
...429 U.S. 941, 97 S.Ct. 357, 50 L.Ed.2d 310; Matter of Ciostek v. Ciostek, 186 A.D.2d 1087, 1088, 588 N.Y.S.2d 690; Moore v. Moore, 115 A.D.2d 894, 895-896, 496 N.Y.S.2d 583). Supreme Court provided in the tenth decretal paragraph that income was imputed to defendant in the amount of $77,000......
-
Zwick v. Kulhan
...to provide for their child rather than their current economic situation (see, Matter of Darling v. Darling, supra; Moore v. Moore, 115 A.D.2d 894, 896, 496 N.Y.S.2d 583). An imputed income amount is based, in part, upon a parent's past earnings, actual earning capacity, and educational back......
-
Alfano v. Alfano
...v. Hickland, 39 N.Y.2d 1, 382 N.Y.S.2d 475, 346 N.E.2d 243; Kay v. Kay, 37 N.Y.2d 632, 376 N.Y.S.2d 443, 339 N.E.2d 143; Moore v. Moore, 115 A.D.2d 894, 496 N.Y.S.2d 583). In the instant case, the plaintiff voluntarily left a job from which he earned approximately $50,000 annually, inclusiv......