Moore v. Silver Valley Min. Co.

Citation10 S.E. 679,104 N.C. 534
PartiesMOORE v. SILVER VALLEY MIN. CO. et al.
Decision Date16 January 1890
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from superior court, Davidson county; JAMES H. MERRIMON Judge.

Action by Everett D. Moore, for himself and all other stockholders of the Silver Valley Mining Company of Baltimore except the defendants, against the Silver Valley Mining Company of North Carolina, and others. There was judgment restraining defendants from disposing of property or assets in their hands. The Silver Valley Mining Company of North Carolina appeals.

Suits for redress of wrongs to a corporation or its stockholders done by the fraud of its officers or otherwise, where its charter and by-laws may have to be interpreted, or the sufficiency of its proceedings questioned, should be brought in the state under the laws of which the corporation was organized and exists, though injunction or other auxiliary action may be brought in another state in which the corporation has property.

Robbins & Raper, N. P. Bond, and M. H. Pinnix, for appellant.

J. J Alexander, R. W. Applegarth, T. B. Eldridge, and W. J Montgomery, for appellee.

MERRIMON C.J.

The complaint used as an affidavit in support of the motion for the injunction in question is very voluminous, alleging facts much in detail. It is sufficient for the present purpose to state that it is alleged that the Silver Valley Mining Company of Baltimore, a defendant in this action, was incorporated and organized under the laws of the state of Maryland in the year 1860, with a capital stock of $1,000,000; that in August of that year it acquired certain valuable mineral lands in this state; that in the latter part of that year, and early in the year 1861, certain officers and stockholders of this company, owning a majority of the shares of its capital stock, fraudulently contriving and intending to get and own the property of their company, procured from the legislature of this state a charter, and under it organized the present defendant, appellant corporation, the Silver Valley Mining Company, whose charter allowed the assessment of shares of the capital stock, as the Baltimore Company did not; that in the year 1861 a meeting of the stockholders of the latter company was called, at which those owning a majority of the capital stock were induced to accept the charter of the present defendant, and to merge the Baltimore Company therein, but the land in this state that is now in controversy was not formally conveyed to the defendant until the 24th day of June, 1882; that that company was organized in the state of Maryland, and the organization was therefore void. It does not appear when the plaintiff obtained his certain shares of the capital stock of the Baltimore Company, but he did so long after the alleged fraudulent organization of the defendant company. It does not allege that himself, or those from whom he purchased his shares of stock, ever in any way took legal, or indeed any, steps to arrest the fraudulent acts and conduct complained of in this state, or in the state of Maryland.

The plaintiff is not the legal owner of the stock he holds. He holds certificates of stock indorsed to him, but certificates have not been issued to him. It is alleged that the Baltimore Company is the proper, lawful owner of the mineral lands mentioned, and also of the judgment presently to be mentioned; that the defendant corporation and the other defendants are about to sell the land, collect the judgment, and fraudulently devote the whole to their own use. It is further alleged as follows:

"(15) The plaintiff further alleges that the said Silver Valley Mining Company has lately recovered, by the judgment of this court, the sum of $18,000, with interest from the 10th day of January, 1881, against a certain corporation incorporated under the laws of North Carolina by the name of the 'Baltimore Gold & Silver Mining & Smelting Company,' upon which a sum of money has been paid, leaving still due the sum of $17,743.50. That said judgment was obtained upon the ground of fraud by the said Baltimore Gold & Silver Mining & Smelting Company on the said Silver Valley Mining Company in procuring the property, stock and assets of said Silver Valley Mining Company, and converting the same to its use, to the amount of said judgment, as appears by the record of said judgment in this court, to which reference is prayed to be had, as if the same were herein recited at large. That said Silver Valley Mining Company was affected by said fraud of the defendant in said judgment, and entitled to and did recover in respect thereof only by reason of its supposed ownership and possession of the said property and assets referred to in the said proceedings of said judgment, and that said judgment was obtained by it as compensation for injury done by said defendant in said judgment to the said property and assets. But the plaintiff alleges that said property and assets to which said injury was done were the property and assets of the Silver Valley Mining Company of Baltimore, and that said Silver Valley Mining Company of North Carolina obtained possession of said property and assets in pursuance of a fraudulent conspiracy among, and by means of fraudulent breaches of trust on the part of, the directors of the Silver Valley Mining Company of Baltimore, or of a majority of them, who were the same persons as the majority of the directors of the North Carolina Company, and by means of fraudulent transactions on the part of the majority of the stockholders of said Silver Valley Mining Company of Baltimore, of all which fraudulent conspiring, breaches of trust, and fraudulent transactions the Silver Valley Mining Company of North Carolina had full notice; and the plaintiff is advised and alleges that the said Silver Valley Mining Company of Baltimore is entitled to the said judgment in respect of the injury done by the said defendant therein to its (the said company's) property and assets, and that the said Silver Valley Mining Company is bound in equity to hold the said judgment in trust for the said Silver Valley Mining Company of Baltimore.
"(16) The plaintiff further alleges that the said Thomas W. Hall, Jr., S. Sutton Clayton, and Joseph Wilkins are the only surviving directors of the Silver Valley Mining Company of Baltimore; the said Talmadge and the said Harris having long since departed this life, as aforesaid. That the said Clayton and said Wilkins are the very persons who, as directors of said company, have committed the acts hereinbefore mentioned; and they refuse to take any steps whatsoever with reference to such acts, or in any way to remedy the wrongs hereinbefore complained of, and form a majority of the board of directors of said company, and the said Hall also refuses to take any steps in reference to said acts.
"(17) That the stockholders of said Silver Valley Mining Company of Baltimore, who maintain the validity of said illegal merger of the said company in the said Silver Valley Mining Company of Baltimore, and of said acts hereinbefore mentioned, hold a majority of the capital stock of the said Silver Valley Mining Company of Baltimore, and have a majority of votes at any general meeting of the stockholders of said company, and in consequence of the preponderating number of votes possessed by them, it is impossible for the plaintiff, or any stockholders in his situation, to take any steps within the said company to remedy the acts and doings hereinbefore complained of; and if such acts and doings be not remedied, and said Wilkins and Clayton and Hall removed from their offices, and the said Silver Valley Mining Company restrained from interfering with or occupying the property and assets of the said Silver Valley Mining Company of Baltimore will be ruined, and the property of the plaintiff therein destroyed.
"(18) The plaintiff further alleges that the said Silver Valley Mining Company has issued execution on its said judgment for the collection of the sum of money due therein against the defendant therein, the Baltimore Gold & Silver Mining & Smelting Company, and has caused said execution to be levied on all the lands and property of the said defendant in said judgment, and P. D. Leonard, Esq., the sheriff of Davidson county, has, in consequence thereof, publicly advertised the same lands to be sold upon the 6th day of May, A. D. 1889, for cash, at the court-house door in Lexington, in said county. And the plaintiff files herewith, as a part of this complaint, marked 'Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 6,' a copy of a handbill giving notice of said execution sale, issued by said sheriff. And the plaintiff further alleges that said Silver Valley Mining Company is insolvent, and that, if it be permitted to collect said judgment by execution and sale of said lands as aforesaid, the moneys realized thereby will be applied by it to its own uses, and dissipated, and will be wholly lost to the Silver Valley Mining Company of Baltimore, which, as the plaintiff alleges, is the true owner of said judgment; and the Silver Mining Company well knows that said Silver Valley Mining Company of Baltimore is entitled to said judgment, and with the connivance of and in collusion with said Wilkins and Clayton, who are a majority, as aforesaid, of the directors of the said Silver Valley Mining Company of Baltimore, and who refuse, as aforesaid, to take any steps to remedy the illegal acts hereinbefore mentioned, and secure the rights of the stockholders of said company, has caused said execution to be issued, and levied on all the lands of the defendant in said judgment, and
...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT