Moore v. State, 92-4082
| Decision Date | 16 February 1994 |
| Docket Number | No. 92-4082,92-4082 |
| Citation | 632 So.2d 199 |
| Parties | 19 Fla. L. Weekly D373 Keith MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Louis Frost, Jr., Public Defender and James T. Miller, Asst. Public Defender, Jacksonville, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Michelle A. Konig, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
AppellantKeith Moore appeals the order of the trial court revoking his probation.At issue is whether the trial court abused its discretion in revoking appellant's probation solely for failure to file one monthly report with his probation officer.On the present facts, we find appellant's failure to file one monthly report does not constitute a substantial violation of the terms of his probation.We reverse and remand, directing the trial court to return appellant to probationary status.
REVERSED and REMANDED for further consistent proceedings.
...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 cases
-
State v. Carter
...that failure to file a single monthly report does not by itself constitute a substantial violation of probation. See Moore v. State, 632 So.2d 199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); accord Sanders v. State, 675 So.2d 665 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). The First District acknowledged that its decision was in conflic......
-
Allen v. State, 94-3355
...pay, we direct the court to reconsider whether the failure to report was, in and of itself, sufficient to revoke. See Moore v. State, 632 So.2d 199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). DELL and STEVENSON, JJ., concur. ...
-
Williams v. State
...to that date, does not constitute a willful and substantial violation of the terms of appellant's probation. See Moore v. State, 632 So.2d 199, 199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). With regard to the allegation that appellant moved without permission, although there was testimony that appellant did, in......
-
John Carter v. State of Florida, 1
...to file a single monthly report does not by itself constitute a substantial violation of the terms of probation. See Moore v. State, 632 So.2d 199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); see also Sanders v. State, 675 So.2d 665 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). Thus, we reverse the order before We acknowledge that our deci......
Get Started for Free