Moore v. State, 15908.
Decision Date | 03 May 1933 |
Docket Number | No. 15908.,15908. |
Parties | MOORE v. STATE. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Falls County; E. M. Dodson, Judge.
David Moore was convicted of assault with intent to murder, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
Terry Dickens and Tom B. Bartlett, both of Marlin, for appellant.
Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.
Assault with intent to murder is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.
Connally Grayson was struck on the head with a baseball bat in the hands of the appellant, David Moore. The blow caused what the doctor called a "depressed fracture of the skull." Grayson was rendered unconscious by the blow, and an operation became necessary. He was in the hospital for twelve days and under treatment for two months.
Grayson was at a baseball game. Moore came to Grayson and told him to move. Grayson said, "All right." Moore said, "Well, I mean for you to get up and get away." Moore then walked away, but later came back. Grayson was sitting with his hands over his knees and his back to Moore. Moore said, "Didn't I tell you to get up from here?" As Grayson started to get up and leave, he was struck with a bat. They had no previous ill feelings. The injury was inflicted on May 11th. Grayson remained unconscious for many days. The blow was struck on the left side of the head just above the ear.
Moore's statement in the way of a confession is as follows:
Appellant testified that he was 43 years of age and a native of Falls county. It appears from his testimony that it was agreed that he would assist those who were playing baseball to keep the women and children from getting on the base lines where some of them might get hurt; that he was trying to keep them back off the lines. From his testimony we quote: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Brown v. State
...when it was shown to him. Exculpatory is often defined as clearing or tending to clear from alleged fault or guilt. Moore v. State, 124 Tex.Cr.R. 97, 60 S.W.2d 453; Steen v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 77, 253 S.W.2d 279; Baird v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 644, 246 S.W.2d 192. Even if the statements we......
- Jackson v. State
-
Colkley v. State
...or guilt’. The various jurisdictions have adhered basically to this definition. The State of Texas in the case of Moore v. State, 124 Tex.Cr.R. 97, 60 S.W.2d 453 [ (1933) ], said that ‘Exculpatory’ means clearing or tending to clear from alleged fault or guilt; excusing.' In the case of Sta......
-
State v. Morales
...County v. State, 812 S.W.2d 303, 313 (Tex.Crim.App.1989); Davis v. State, 474 S.W.2d 466, 467-68 (Tex.Crim.App.1971); Moore v. State, 60 S.W.2d 453, 454 (Tex.Crim.App.1933). For the specific purposes of the rule constraining the State from disposing of potentially exculpatory evidence, the ......