Morales v. D & a Food Service

Decision Date25 June 2008
Docket NumberNo. 117,117
Citation10 N.Y.3d 911,892 N.E.2d 842
PartiesLino MORALES, Appellant, v. D & A FOOD SERVICE, Defendant, and Camillo M. Santomero, III, Respondent.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, defendant Santomero's motion for summary judgment denied, plaintiffs cross motion for partial summary judgment on his Labor Law § 240(1) cause of action against defendant Santomero granted and the certified question answered in the negative.

Contrary to defendant's argument, plaintiff's work constituted an alteration within the meaning of Labor Law § 240(1) (see Joblon v. Solow, 91 N.Y.2d 457, 465, 672 N.Y.S.2d 286, 695 N.E.2d 237 [1998]). In light of our recent decision in Sanatass v. Consolidated Inv. Co., Inc., 10 N.Y.3d 333, 858 N.Y.S.2d 67, 887 N.E.2d 1125 (2008), defendant's contention that he lacks a sufficient nexus with plaintiff to support liability under section 240(1) is without merit. Since plaintiff made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on his section 240(1) claim and defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition thereto, plaintiff is entitled to partial summary judgment on liability.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES concur; Judge CIPARICK taking no part.

Order reversed, with costs, defendant Santomero's motion for summary judgment denied, plaintiff's cross motion for partial summary judgment as to liability on his Labor Law § 240(1) cause of action against defendant Santomero granted and certified question answered in the negative, in a memorandum.

To continue reading

Request your trial
72 cases
  • Eskay Diamonds LLC v. MGA Diamond Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 15 Febrero 2013
    ...by producing evidence, in admissible form, sufficient to require a trial of material factual issues.Page 2Morales v. D & A Food Serv., 10 N.Y.3d 911, 913 (2008); Hyman v. Queens County Bancorp, Inc., 3 N.Y.3d 743, 744 (2004). In evaluating the evidence for plaintiff's motion, the court must......
  • ACC Concrete Corp. v. Core Cont'l Constr., LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 21 Agosto 2013
    ...by producing evidence, in admissible form, sufficient to require a trial of material factual issues. Morales v. D & A Food Serv., 10 N.Y.3d 911, 913 (2008); Hvman v. Queens County Bancorp, Inc.,Page 33 N.Y.3d 743, 744 (2004). In evaluating the evidence for purposes of the parties' motions, ......
  • Tuchman v. Deam Props. (Us), LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 25 Abril 2014
    ...by producing evidence, in admissible form, sufficient to require a trial of material factual issues. Morales v. D & A Food Serv., 10 N.Y.3d 911, 913 (2008); Hyman v. Queens County Bancorp, Inc., 3 N.Y.3d 743, 744 (2004). If the moving parties fail to meet their initial burden, the court mus......
  • Am. Infertility of N.Y., P.C. v. Verizon N.Y. Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 10 Diciembre 2020
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT