Moran v. Stewart

Decision Date28 May 1894
PartiesMORAN v. STEWART.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from circuit court, Andrew county; C. A. Anthony, Judge.

Action by Angie Moran against Samuel Stewart. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

David Rea and Jas. F. Pitt, for appellant. P. Mercer, Booher & Williams, and J. A. Sanders, for respondent

BLACK, C. J.

On the 17th April, 1869, David Moran and his wife, Catharine Moran, by deed duly executed, acknowledged, and recorded, adopted the defendant, Samuel Stewart, as their child and heir. Catharine Moran died, leaving her husband surviving. Thereafter, and on the 5th February, 1891, he and the plaintiff in this suit were married. He died testate on the 13th March, 1892, having devised the 400 acres of land now in question to Samuel Stewart, his adopted son. On the 8th September, 1892, the plaintiff signed, acknowledged, and recorded her election to take one-half of the real and personal estate of deceased in lieu of dower. She then brought this suit for the partition of the 400 acres, basing her claim to the one-half on the theory that her husband died "without any child or descendant in being capable of inheriting," within the meaning of Rev. St. 1889, § 4518. Section 4513, being the first section of the dower act, provides that "every widow shall be endowed of the third part of all lands whereof her husband or other person to his use, died seized of an estate of inheritance," to hold and enjoy during her natural life. Section 4518: "When the husband shall die without any child or other descendants in being, capable of inheriting, his widow shall be entitled: First * * *; second, to one-half of the real and personal estate belonging to the husband at the time of his death, absolutely, subject to the payment of the husband's debts." Section 4520: "When the husband shall die without a child or other descendant living, capable of inheriting, the widow shall have her election to take her dower, as provided in section 4513, discharged of debts, or the provisions of section 4518, as therein provided."

Now, the first section of the act concerning the adoption of children provides that "if any person in this state shall desire to adopt any child or children as his or her heir or devisee, it shall be lawful for such person to do the same by deed, which deed shall be executed, acknowledged and recorded in the county of the residence of the person executing the same, as in the case of conveyances of real estate." This section, it will be seen, speaks of adopting a child as heir or devisee. It is difficult to see what the legislature meant by the use of the word "devisee." One thing is certain, and that is this: that the deed of adoption cannot operate as, and perform the functions of, a will. The adopting parent may dispose of his property by last will,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
22 cases
  • In re Book's Will
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • October 25, 1918
    ...that the statutory adoption of a child did not invest the husband with the common-law right of curtesy. It distinguished Moran v. Stewart, 122 Mo. 295, 26 S. W. 962. upon the ground that under the Missouri statute the right of the widow to take one-half in fee in lieu of dower was made depe......
  • Hockaday v. Lynn
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 22, 1906
    ...she was given "everything that adoption contemplates" —that and no more. So, too, Black, J., in Moran v. Stewart, 122 Mo., loc. cit. 299, 26 S. W. 962, says: "For all the of inheriting from the adopting parent the adopted child becomes, and is, the lawful child of such adopting parent." It ......
  • Burnes v. Burnes
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Missouri
    • September 19, 1904
    ... ... Such is and has been the law ... of Missouri. As bearing upon the different phases of the ... foregoing, see Moran v. Stewart, 122 Mo. 295, 26 ... S.W. 962; Sarazin v. R.R. Co., 153 Mo. 479, 55 S.W ... 92; Clarkson v. Hatton, 143 Mo. 47, 44 S.W. 761, 39 ... ...
  • Sayles v. Christie
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • October 19, 1900
    ...who dies leaving such adopted child, cannot elect to take one-half of her husband's real estate under the statute. Moran v. Stewart, 122 Mo. 297, 26 S. W. 962;Power v. Hafley, 85 Ky. 672, 4 S. W. 683;Atchison v. Atchison's Ex'rs, 89 Ky. 490, 12 S. W. 942;Buckley v. Frazier, 153 Mass. 525, 2......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT