Moreland v. Moreland, 20115

Decision Date26 October 1979
Docket NumberNo. 20115,20115
Citation589 S.W.2d 828
PartiesRose MORELAND, Appellant, v. Carl MORELAND, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

George C. Roland, Jr., McKinney, for appellant.

Tom O'Connell, Plano, for appellee.

Before AKIN, STOREY and HUMPHREYS, JJ.

AKIN, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant an increase in child support for the parties' two minor sons. Because the evidence is undisputed that a material change of circumstances occurred from the date of the divorce decree setting child support and the date on which appellant's motion to increase support was filed, we hold that the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing to increase support in accordance with the evidence. Accordingly, we reverse the order denying an increase and remand for further proceedings.

The parties were divorced on January 19, 1973, and appellant was awarded custody of the parties' three minor children. By agreement of the parties, approved by the court in its judgment, child support was set at $83 per month for each child. On October 19, 1978, appellant filed a motion to increase the amount of child support for the parties' two remaining minor sons, one of whom was thirteen years of age and the other sixteen. On January 11, 1979, a hearing was had on the motion and on February 26, 1979, the trial judge rendered his order denying an increase in child support. In this decree, the judge found that the circumstances of the children and the parties had not materially changed since rendition of the original divorce decree and, accordingly, denied an increase. The mother appealed.

Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 14.08(c)(1) & (2) (Vernon Supp.1978-79) provides that child support may be increased upon a showing that the circumstances between the time of the prior support order and the time a change is sought have materially changed so as to affect the best interest of the children. Labowitz v. Labowitz, 542 S.W.2d 922, 925 (Tex.Civ.App. Dallas 1976, no writ). The purpose of this requirement is to prevent vexatious litigation of such matters as custody and support. As we held in Bergerac v. Maloney, 556 S.W.2d 586 (Tex.Civ.App. Dallas 1977, no writ), a movant is required to adduce evidence of the circumstances of the children and parties At the time the prior decree was rendered and of the circumstances At the time the prior order is sought to be modified. From this evidence, the trial judge is able to ascertain whether there has indeed been a substantial change justifying modification of the prior order.

In the present case, the evidence adduced was that at the time of divorce in 1973, appellant had a residential building business, which...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Phillips v. Phillips
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 5 Junio 1985
    ...of each party since the entry of the original order which was contained in the divorce judgment. See Moreland v. Moreland, 589 S.W.2d 828, 829 (Tex.Civ.App.--Dallas 1979, writ dism'd); Bradshaw v. Billups, 587 S.W.2d 61, 62 (Tex.Civ.App.--Eastland 1979, no We have reviewed the evidence hear......
  • Hammond v. Hammond
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 27 Abril 1995
    ...in modifying the prior order. Id. This narrow interpretation of section 14.08 was later reinforced in Moreland v. Moreland, 589 S.W.2d 828 (Tex.Civ.App.--Dallas 1979, writ dism'd), in which the Dallas Court of Appeals cited Bergerac for the proposition that to show a material and substantia......
  • Blanco v. Gracia
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 16 Marzo 1989
    ...651 (Tex.1985); Strauss v. Strauss, 619 S.W.2d 18, 19 (Tex.Civ.App.--Corpus Christi 1981, no writ); Moreland v. Moreland, 589 S.W.2d 828, 829 (Tex.Civ.App.--Dallas 1979, writ dism'd); Bradshaw v. Billups, 587 S.W.2d 61, 62 (Tex.Civ.App.--Eastland 1979, no Our examination of the transcript s......
  • Belcher v. Belcher, 08-90-00196-CV
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 3 Abril 1991
    ...change in the circumstances of the children or the parents since the time the order was entered. Moreland v. Moreland, 589 S.W.2d 828 (Tex.Civ.App.--Dallas 1979, writ dismissed). The trial judge found that the circumstances of the parties had materially changed, and the parties do not chall......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT