Morell v. Peekskill Ranch, Inc.
Decision Date | 14 February 1985 |
Citation | 487 N.Y.S.2d 319,64 N.Y.2d 859,476 N.E.2d 645 |
Parties | , 476 N.E.2d 645 Diana MORELL et al., Appellants, v. PEEKSKILL RANCH, INC., Respondent. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Martin S. Rothman, New York City, for appellants.
Nathan Cyperstein and Steve S. Efron, New York City, for respondent.
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs, and a new trial granted for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Justice Isaac Rubin at the Appellate Division (104 A.D.2d 492, 493-495, 479 N.Y.S.2d 241).
To continue reading
Request your trial10 cases
-
DeVeau v. US
... ... Lowrey v. Cumberland Farms, Inc., 162 A.D.2d 777, 778, 557 N.Y.S.2d 689, 690 (3rd Dept.1990); Edwards v ... , 183 A.D.2d 1071, 1072-73, 583 N.Y.S.2d 644, 645 (3rd Dept.1992); Morell v. Peekskill Ranch, Inc., 104 A.D.2d 492, 494, 479 N.Y.S.2d 241, 244 (2d ... ...
-
Barone v. Risi
...of dangerous terrain” (Diven v. Village of Hastings–on–Hudson, 156 A.D.2d 538, 539, 548 N.Y.S.2d 807 ; see Morell v. Peekskill Ranch, 64 N.Y.2d 859, 487 N.Y.S.2d 319, 476 N.E.2d 645 ; Le Roux v. State of New York, 307 N.Y. 397, 121 N.E.2d 386 ). However, a landowner does not have a duty to ......
-
Tarricone v. State
...is that the State must take such precautions where latent dangers exist not readily apparent to the public (Morell v. Peekskill Ranch, 64 N.Y.2d 859, 487 N.Y.S.2d 319, 476 N.E.2d 645 [defendant failed to provide signs to safeguard guests from a dangerous condition which was not open and obv......
-
Diven by Diven v. Village of Hastings-on-Hudson
...terrain (see, e.g., Morell v. Peekskill Ranch, Inc., 104 A.D.2d 492, 493-95, 479 N.Y.S.2d 241 [dissenting opn], revd. 64 N.Y.2d 859, 487 N.Y.S.2d 319, 476 N.E.2d 645 on dissent of Rubin, J.; Malvaso v. State of New York, 15 Misc.2d 585, 182 N.Y.S.2d 62, affd. 10 A.D.2d 663, 197 N.Y.S.2d 452......
Request a trial to view additional results