Morell v. Peekskill Ranch, Inc.

Decision Date14 February 1985
Citation487 N.Y.S.2d 319,64 N.Y.2d 859,476 N.E.2d 645
Parties, 476 N.E.2d 645 Diana MORELL et al., Appellants, v. PEEKSKILL RANCH, INC., Respondent.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Martin S. Rothman, New York City, for appellants.

Nathan Cyperstein and Steve S. Efron, New York City, for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs, and a new trial granted for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Justice Isaac Rubin at the Appellate Division (104 A.D.2d 492, 493-495, 479 N.Y.S.2d 241).

WACHTLER, C.J., and JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • DeVeau v. US
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of New York
    • 16 septembre 1993
    ... ... Lowrey v. Cumberland Farms, Inc., 162 A.D.2d 777, 778, 557 N.Y.S.2d 689, 690 (3rd Dept.1990); Edwards v ... , 183 A.D.2d 1071, 1072-73, 583 N.Y.S.2d 644, 645 (3rd Dept.1992); Morell v. Peekskill Ranch, Inc., 104 A.D.2d 492, 494, 479 N.Y.S.2d 241, 244 (2d ... ...
  • Barone v. Risi
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 20 mai 2015
    ...of dangerous terrain” (Diven v. Village of Hastings–on–Hudson, 156 A.D.2d 538, 539, 548 N.Y.S.2d 807 ; see Morell v. Peekskill Ranch, 64 N.Y.2d 859, 487 N.Y.S.2d 319, 476 N.E.2d 645 ; Le Roux v. State of New York, 307 N.Y. 397, 121 N.E.2d 386 ). However, a landowner does not have a duty to ......
  • Tarricone v. State
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 3 juillet 1991
    ...is that the State must take such precautions where latent dangers exist not readily apparent to the public (Morell v. Peekskill Ranch, 64 N.Y.2d 859, 487 N.Y.S.2d 319, 476 N.E.2d 645 [defendant failed to provide signs to safeguard guests from a dangerous condition which was not open and obv......
  • Diven by Diven v. Village of Hastings-on-Hudson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 18 décembre 1989
    ...terrain (see, e.g., Morell v. Peekskill Ranch, Inc., 104 A.D.2d 492, 493-95, 479 N.Y.S.2d 241 [dissenting opn], revd. 64 N.Y.2d 859, 487 N.Y.S.2d 319, 476 N.E.2d 645 on dissent of Rubin, J.; Malvaso v. State of New York, 15 Misc.2d 585, 182 N.Y.S.2d 62, affd. 10 A.D.2d 663, 197 N.Y.S.2d 452......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT