Moren v. American Fire-Clay Co.

Decision Date20 November 1897
Citation28 S.E. 728,44 W.Va. 42
PartiesMOREN et al. v. AMERICAN FIRE-CLAY CO. et al.
CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court

Submitted Sept. 10, 1897

Syllabus by the Court.

The transcript of a justice's docket, noting the return of a summons by an officer, is not so conclusive as to render a judgment void for the reason that such return as set out in such transcript is defective, as the justice is not required to make other than a brief note of such return in his docket.

Appeal from circuit court, Hancock county; Joseph R. Paull and H. C Hervey, Judges.

Bill by John Moren against the American Fire-Clay Company and others. John Francy and Carrie S. Hilsinger filed petitions to be made parties plaintiff. There was an order sustaining defendant John H. Atkinson's demurrer to the bill, and from a decree of dismissal plaintiffs John Francy and Carrie S. Hilsinger appeal. Reversed.

JOHN E. MCKennan, for appellants.

Ewing Melvin & Ewing, for appellees.

DENT J.

John Moren, plaintiff, filed a bill in chancery in the circuit court of Hancock county against the American Fire-Clay Company and others, setting up a judgment lien against said company, attacking certain conveyances and transfers of property to John H. Atkinson, defendant, as fraudulent and void, making various other lien creditors parties, and asking that the property of said company, with the liens and priorities thereon, be ascertained, and that such property be sold to satisfy such liens. Defendant Atkinson appeared, and demurred to the bill, and on the 3d day of April, 1897, the circuit court entered an order sustaining such demurrer, as follows: "This cause came on this 3d day of April, 1897 upon the demurrer in writing of John H. Atkinson, one of the defendants, to the amended bill filed by the plaintiffs against him and others, which demurrer was set down for argument, and argued by counsel; and the court being of opinion that the judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the American Fire-Clay Company, obtained on the 20th day of June, 1895, before E. A. Hart, a justice of 'Hancock' county, for the sum of three hundred dollars and interest and cost, is void upon its face, there being no sufficient service of the summons in the cause, as appears by the transcript of said judgment exhibited with the bill, and that, in consequence, the plaintiff has not shown himself entitled to any lien upon the property mentioned in the bill or to any remedy against it or against any of the parties defendant, it is adjudged, ordered, and decreed that the said demurrer be, and the same is hereby, sustained; whereupon the complainant asked leave to amend by alleging in his said bill that in the action before E. A. Hart, justice, in which the said judgment for $300 was rendered in favor of the complainant, John Moren, the defendant the American Fire-Clay Company appeared on the 20th day of June, 1895, before the said justice, to answer the said action, by Thomas Stewart, its secretary, and that the said Thomas Stewart was then the secretary of the said defendant the American Fire-Clay Company, and was duly authorized to appear for it to answer the said action; and the court, being of opinion that the proposed amendment will not avail to give the plaintiff a right to maintain his suit, doth overrule the motion of the plaintiff to amend. Then came John Francy, receiver of the Toronto Banking Company, and Carrie S. Hilsinger, who filed petitions herein on the 22d day of March, 1897, and moved that they be permitted to prosecute this suit as plaintiffs for their own benefit, or of such other lienors as may come in and contribute to the expenses of this suit, and that they have leave to file a bill for that purpose, which motion the court overrules. It is therefore adjudged, ordered, and decreed that the plaintiff's bill and amended bill be dismissed, and that the defendant J. H. Atkinson recover of and against the plaintiff, John Moren, his costs by him about his defense herein expended." The plaintiff John Francy, receiver of the Toronto Banking Company, and Carrie S. Hilsinger, appeal, and assign as error (1) the sustaining of the demurrer; (2) the refusal to allow the suit to proceed in the name of Robert Francy, receiver of the Toronto Banking Company, and Carrie S. Hilsinger.

The transcript of the justice's record is as follows:

"State of West Virginia, Hancock County, to wit: John Moren vs. The American Fire-Clay Co. Suit to Recover $300, Due for Balance for Labor Performed. Before E. A. Hart, J. P.
"June 25th, 1895, personally came John Moren, who filed complaint, and gave bond for attachment, in the sum of six hundred dollars, with
...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT