Morgan-Leland v. University of Maine, MORGAN-LELAND
| Decision Date | 22 October 1993 |
| Docket Number | MORGAN-LELAND |
| Citation | 632 A.2d 748 |
| Parties | 86 Ed. Law Rep. 916 Deborahv. UNIVERSITY OF MAINE. |
| Court | Maine Supreme Court |
Laurie Anne Miller, (orally), Ferris, Dearborn & Willey, Brewer, for plaintiff.
Peter M. Weatherbee, (orally), Mitchell & Stearns, Bangor, for defendant.
Before WATHEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD, COLLINS, RUDMAN and DANA, JJ.
Deborah Morgan-Leland appeals from a decision of the Maine Workers' Compensation Board dismissing her petition for reinstatement. She contends that the Board improperly applied a statute enacted subsequent to the date of her injury. Finding no error, we affirm.
Morgan-Leland received a work-related injury in 1988, while employed by defendant University of Maine, and received workers' compensation benefits for total incapacity. Subsequently, she returned to work in another position but was later laid off and full compensation payments were resumed. In 1993, Morgan-Leland filed a petition seeking reinstatement to work pursuant to the provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act in effect at the time of her injury. That statute allowed reinstatement anytime "until one year after the employee has reached the stage of maximum medical improvement...." 39 M.R.S.A. § 66-A(3), repealed by P.L.1991, ch. 885, § A-7 (effective January 1, 1993). The Board found that Morgan-Leland's petition was barred by the current Act, which provides in relevant part:
The employer's obligation to reinstate the employee continues until one year, or 3 years if the employer has over 200 employees, after the date of the injury.
39-A M.R.S.A. § 218(3) (Pamph.1993). Because the University had more than two hundred employees and more than three years had elapsed since the date of Morgan-Leland's injury, the Board dismissed her petition.
Morgan-Leland argues that application of the new statute to injuries occurring before its effective date is improper because there is no clear indication that the legislature intended such an application. She concedes that the legislature can take such action; the only issue is whether the legislature has clearly indicated an intention to do so. See, e.g., Norton v. C.P. Blouin, Inc., 511 A.2d 1056, 1061 (Me.1986) (). The University argues that there is clear evidence of legislative intent to apply section 218 to injuries occurring before the effective date of the statute.
In enacting the new workers' compensation statute, including section 218, the legislature provided So as not to alter benefits for injuries incurred before January 1, 1993, for matters in which the injury occurred prior to that date, all the provisions of this Act apply, except that the Maine Revised Statutes, Title 39-A, sections 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 221, 306, and 325 do not apply. With regard to matters in which the injury occurred prior to January 1, 1993, the applicable provisions of former Title 39 apply in place of Title 39-A, sections 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 221, 306...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Kittery Retail Ventures v. Town of Kittery
...or statute's effective date. E.g., Portland Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Town of Gray, 663 A.2d 41, 42 (Me.1995); Morgan-Leland v. Univ. of Me., 632 A.2d 748, 748 (Me.1993). [¶ 12] When a statute becomes effective, however, is more of a procedural matter and is governed, for state statutes, by ME......
-
Bowie v. Delta Airlines, Inc.
...the petition for appellate review expressly excluded the retroactivity issue from consideration on appeal. Morgan-Leland v. University of Maine, 632 A.2d 748 (Me.1993).2 A primary purpose for the enactment of title 39-A was to reduce workers' compensation costs to employers, generally, in o......
-
Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.
...new statute to "matters in which the injury occurred prior to January 1, 1993." P.L.1991, ch. 885, § A-10(1); Morgan-Leland v. University of Maine, 632 A.2d 748, 748-49 (Me.1993). That expression of legislative intent, however, does not at all address the question of whether the Act applies......
-
Brawn v. Gloria's Country Inn, WCB-96-319
...A-7, A-8. Maine Workers' Compensation Act of 1992, P.L. 1991, ch. 885, § A-10(1) (effective January 1, 1993); Morgan-Leland v. University of Maine, 632 A.2d 748, 748-49 (Me.1993). Section 206 and former section 52 contain virtually identical language with respect to this issue and therefore......