Morganton Mfg. & Trading Co. v. Foy-Seawell Lumber Co.

Decision Date03 December 1919
Docket Number485.
CitationMorganton Mfg. & Trading Co. v. Foy-Seawell Lumber Co., 101 S.E. 214, 178 N.C. 571 (N.C. 1919)
PartiesMORGANTON MFG. & TRADING CO. v. FOY-SEAWELL LUMBER CO.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from Superior Court, Burke County; Long, Judge.

Action by the Morganton Manufacturing & Trading Company against the Foy-Seawell Lumber Company, wherein the Battery Park Bank intervened.From judgment against the intervener on plaintiff's motion, the intervener appeals.Affirmed.

See also, 99 S.E. 104.

Where attached property was sold, and the proceeds deposited in an intervening bank by agreement of the parties made a part of the record, and the bank received the money under the agreement, the court could order the bank, which had undertaken to set up an adverse claim, to pay the money to another commissioner appointed by it, having general superintending power over moneys collected under its process.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in the above-entitled action against the respondent the Battery Park Bank of Asheville, N. C., on the motion of the plaintiff, heard out of the district at Statesville, N. C., by consent, upon a rule to show cause why said respondent should not be required to file statement and pay to the commissioner appointed in this action all such funds as had been deposited with it by the defendant or come into its hands since the 10th day of May, 1915, from the proceeds of sales of the property attached in this action.

The said judgment was rendered upon a consideration of the proceedings in this action, as appears of record and on file herein, and the affidavits and proofs offered on said hearing before Judge B. F. Long, as follows:

(1) This action was begun in the Superior court of Burke county on the 26th day of April, 1915, by summons issued out of the superior court of Burke county, and an attachment therein levied upon the property of the defendant, that a part of the said property consisted of a carload of lumber, which was levied on under said attachment at Hickory, in Catawba county, while in the act of being shipped out of the state to M. P. Berglass & Co., of New York, to whom it had been consigned by the defendant.

(2) That shortly after this action was instituted, to wit, on the 10th day of May, 1915, an agreement was entered into between the plaintiff, Morganton Manufacturing & Trading Company, and the defendant, Foy-Seawell Lumber Company, and filed and made a part of the record, whereby it was stipulated that the defendant might sell and dispose of the Berglass car of lumber and other property attached, and deposit the proceeds of such sale or sales with the Battery Park Bank of Asheville, N. C., to be held by said bank pending the outcome of said action; the said agreement reciting, among other things: "That, whereas, a car of lumber has been loaded and billed to M. P. Berglass & Co., of Brooklyn, N. Y., and whereas, the draft covering said shipment has been assigned to the Battery Park Bank of Asheville, N. C., for collection and whereas, a portion of the balance of said lumber, now at Morganton, N. C., has been sold by the defendant: It is therefore agreed that the said car of lumber consigned and billed to the said M. P. Berglass Company, of Brooklyn, N Y., be released from said attachment, and that the proceeds of the sale of said car of lumber be deposited in and held by the Battery Park Bank, of Asheville, N. C., pending the outcome or settlement of said suit, subject to the rights of both plaintiff and defendant, and without prejudice."

(3) That after said agreement had been filed and made a part of the record, as aforesaid, to wit, at the October term, 1915 of the superior court of Burke county, the said Battery Park Bank came into court by and through its attorneys, Lee & Ford, and intervened and made itself a party to this action by filing affidavit in which it set up title under mortgage to a part of the property attached in this action, including a part of that contained in the Berglass car which was shipped in the name of the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Swink v. Horn
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 20, 1946
    ... ... Morganton Mfg. & Trading Co. v. Foy-Seawell Lumber Co., ... 178 N.C ... ...
  • Morgan v. Town of Norwood
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • May 19, 1937
    ... ... 226 ...          In ... Morganton Mfg. & Trading Co. v. Foy-Seawell Lumber ... Co., 178 N.C ... ...
  • First Nat. Pictures Distributing Corporation v. Sewell
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 1, 1933
    ... ... George, 176 N.C. 602, 97 S.E. 507; ... Morganton Mfg. & Trading Co. v. Lumber Co., 178 N.C ... 571, 101 ... ...
  • Wilson v. City of Charlotte
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • July 11, 1934
    ... ... sufficient to support the judgment." Morganton Mfg. & Trading Co. v. Lumber Co., 178 N.C. 571, 101 S.E ... ...
  • Get Started for Free