Moriarty v. Bartlett
| Decision Date | 09 June 1885 |
| Citation | 99 N.Y. 651 |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
| Parties | POLLY MORIORTY, Respondent, v. CAROLINE L. BARTLETT, Appellant. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Leslie W. Russell, for appellants, Virgil C. Bartlett and others, Ex'rs, etc.
Wm. P. Cantwell, for respondent, Polly Moriarty.
It was conceded on the argument of this appeal that the principle determining the survivability of the cause of action was similar to that applicable to a cause of action given to the representatives of a person whose death was occasioned by the negligent or wrongful act of an individual or corporation provided for by section 1902, Code Civil Proc.We are also of that opinion, and having in the case of Hegerich v. Keddie, ante, 787, decided at this term, held that such a cause of action does not survive, we think this case is controlled by that decision.
The orders of the general and special terms should therefore be reversed, and the application denied, with costs in both courts.
(All concur; FINCH, J., on authority of Hegerich v. Keddie.)
*State Report Title: Moriorty v. Bartlett
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
American Surety Company of New York v. State, ex rel. Holtam
... ... (1905), 36 Ind.App. 73, 74 N.E. 1111, but attention is called ... to the fact that a case cited in that opinion to this point ( ... Moriarty v. Bartlett [1884], 34 Hun 272) ... was reversed on appeal. Moriarty v ... Bartlett (1885), 99 N.Y. 651, 1 N.E. 794. The ... supreme court of New ... ...
-
American Sur. Co. of New York v. State ex rel. Holtam
...the fact that the case cited in that opinion to this point (Moriarity v. Bartlett, 34 Hun, 272) was reversed on appeal. Moriorty v. Bartlett, 99 N. Y. 651, 1 N. E. 794;Hegerich v. Keddie, 99 N. Y. 258, 1 N. E. 787, 52 Am. Rep. 25. The Supreme Court of New York held in that case that a right......
- Hegerich v. Keddie