Morley v. State, HH-230
| Decision Date | 03 October 1978 |
| Docket Number | No. HH-230,HH-230 |
| Citation | 362 So.2d 1013 |
| Parties | Robert Logan MORLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., A. S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
This is an appeal from a conviction and sentence for resisting an officer without violence and attempted battery upon a law enforcement officer.
Robert Logan Morley was initially arrested for fighting, a misdemeanor that was not committed in the presence of a law enforcement officer. That arrest was improper. Section 901.15, Florida Statutes (1977). In fact, it was later determined that Morley was not involved in the fight. In the course of the arrest Morley resisted. He was charged with resisting arrest with violence and was found guilty of resisting arrest without violence.
In Florida, the common law right to resist an illegal arrest With force has been abrogated by statute Section 776.051, Florida Statutes (1977). Thus, legality of the arrest is not a factor in that situation. There has been no statutory change, however, to the right to resist an illegal arrest Without force. Marshall v. State, 354 So.2d 107 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1978); Lowery v. State, 356 So.2d 1325 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1975). Thus, we think the conviction for resisting arrest without violence must be reversed.
The conviction for attempted battery of a law enforcement officer while in the lawful performance of his duty is affirmed. The incident giving rise to that charge took place at the police station while the officers were investigating the fight that had taken place earlier. We believe that the investigation constituted the lawful performance of a legal duty.
The conviction and sentence for resisting an officer without violence is reversed. The conviction and sentence for attempted battery on a law enforcement officer is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Tillman v. State
...common-law right to resist an illegal arrest with force. State v. Saunders, 339 So.2d 641, 642 n. 2 (Fla. 1976); Morley v. State, 362 So.2d 1013, 1014 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Lowery v. State, 356 So.2d 1325, 1325-26 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Statutes in derogation of the common law should be strict......
-
K.Y.E. v. State, 89-2851
...or violence. Smith v. State, 399 So.2d 70 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Davis v. State, 381 So.2d 285 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Morley v. State, 362 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Lowery v. State, 356 So.2d 1325 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Marshall v. State, 354 So.2d 107 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). Accordingly, we RE......
-
Tims v. State
...be sure, Tims does not assert that he had the legal right to use violence against officers unlawfully present. Cf. Morley v. State, 362 So.2d 1013, 1014 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) (noting common-law right to resist illegal arrest abrogated by statute). But the practical difference between that and......
-
Hendry Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County
... ... METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the ... State of Florida, Appellee ... No. 92-44 ... District Court of Appeal of Florida, ... Third District ... ...