Morris v. Barnette, O-M
Decision Date | 21 June 1977 |
Docket Number | O-M,No. 8471,8471 |
Citation | 553 S.W.2d 648 |
Parties | Delilah MORRIS, Appellant v. C. C. BARNETTE, d/b/a We Never Close Coin-at, et al., Appellees. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Harry B. Friedman, Harkness, Friedman & Kusin, Texarkana, for appellant.
Charles D. Barnette, Arnold, Arnold, Lavender & Rochelle, Texarkana, Ark., for appellees.
A summary judgment dismissing with prejudice the action of plaintiff below was entered in the trial court. The judgment is reversed and the case remanded to the trial court.
In summary, this is a suit by a business invitee against the possessor of business premises, open to the public, to recover both actual and exemplary damages for personal injuries inflicted by the acts of a third person. Mrs. Delilah Morris pled that she was a customer and invitee at a washateria operated by C. C. Barnette, d/b/a We Never Close Coin-O-Mat Washateria and We Never Close Coin-O-Mat Washateria, when she was physically and sexually assaulted and injured; that the negligence of Barnette and We Never Close Coin-O-Mat Washateria was a proximate cause of her injury; the negligence alleged was "(F)ailure to take such necessary precautions, such as having a watchman, an alarm, or some type of protection as would have protected Plaintiff, an invitee, from the occurrence herein complained of." The indicated defendants answered with numerous special exceptions and a general denial. Hereafter, reference to Barnette includes reference to We Never Close Coin-O-Mat Washateria unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
With reference to the duty of a possessor of business premises to control the conduct of a third party on the premises, Prosser, The Law of Torts, p. 405 (3rd Ed. 1964), says that:
American Law Institute's Restatement of the Law of Torts, Second, Sec. 344 (1965), states:
"A possessor of land who holds it open to the public for entry for his business purposes is subject to liability to the members of the public while they are upon the land for such a purpose, for physical harm caused by the accidental, negligent, or intentionally harmful acts of third persons or animals, and by the failure of the possessor to exercise reasonable care to (a) discover that such acts are being done or are likely to be done, or (b) give a warning adequate to enable the visitors to avoid the harm, or otherwise to protect them against it."
Comment f under the quoted section discusses the duty of the possessor of the land to police the premises and says:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
HNMC, Inc. v. Chan
...his prisoners with adequate protection); Eitel v. Times, Inc. , 221 Or. 585, 352 P.2d 485 (1960) ; Morris v. Barnette , 553 S.W.2d 648 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 1977, writ ref'd n.r.e.) ; Alonge v. Rodriquez , 89 Wis.2d 544, 279 N.W.2d 207, 210 (1979) ; Korenak v. Curative Workshop Adult Rehab. ......
-
HNMC, Inc. v. Chan
... ... provide his prisoners with adequate protection); Eitel v ... Times, Inc. , 352 P.2d 485 (Or. 1960); Morris v ... Barnette , 553 S.W.2d 648 (Tex. App.-Texarkana 1977, writ ... ref'd n.r.e.); Alonge v. Rodriquez , 279 N.W.2d ... 207, 210 ... ...
-
Del Lago Partners, Inc. v. Smith
...19 cmt. f (2010) (emphasis added). 22 Exxon Corp. v. Tidwell, 867 S.W.2d 19, 21 (Tex. 1993) (quoting Morris v. Barnette, 553 S.W.2d 648, 650 (Tex.Civ.App.-Texarkana 1977, writ ref'd n.r.e.)); see also Garner v. McGinty, 771 S.W.2d 242, 246 (Tex.App.-Austin 1989, no writ) ("We hold that a bu......
-
Krier v. Safeway Stores 46, Inc.
...assaulted a plaintiff. LaFleur v. Astrodome-Astrohall Stadium Corp., 751 S.W.2d 563, 565 (Tex.App.1988) (quoting Morris v. Barnette, 553 S.W.2d 648, 649 (Tex.Civ.App.1977)). In Ortega, 902 P.2d at 202, we described the common law rationale for imposing premises liability on the tenant, rath......
-
"am I My Brother's Keeper?": Requiring Landowner Disclosure of the Presence of Sex Offenders and Other Criminal Activity
...203. Id. at 489. 204. Id. at 490. 205. 890 S.W.2d 250 (Ark. 1994). 206. Id. at 250. 207. Id. at 252. 208. See, e.g., Morris v. Barnette, 553 S.W.2d 648, 650 (Tex. Ct. App. 1977) (holding that washateria business has duty to warn or provide reasonable protection to invitees based on location......