Morris v. State, 8 Div. 329.
Decision Date | 22 March 1932 |
Docket Number | 8 Div. 329. |
Citation | 142 So. 592,25 Ala.App. 156 |
Parties | MORRIS v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Rehearing Granted June 7, 1932.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Lawrence County; James E. Horton, Judge.
George L. Morris was convicted of arson in the second degree, and he appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
In arson prosecution, photograph identified as place where building burned relevant as showing building was burned held admissible, though merely cumulative evidence.
The opinion of Horton, Circuit Judge, on the motion for a new trial, is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McCoy v. State
...1235 (Ala.1977); Smothers v. State, 38 Ala.App. 153, 83 So.2d 374, cert. denied, 263 Ala. 701, 83 So.2d 376 (1955); Morris v. State, 25 Ala.App. 156, 142 So. 592 (1932), where the corroborating evidence consisted of the testimony of the wife of an accomplice concerning a conversation she ov......
-
Tillison v. State, 6 Div. 473.
... ... State, ... 136 Ala. 85, 33 So. 878; Fincher v. State, 211 Ala ... 388, 100 So. 657; Morris v. State, 25 Ala.App. 156, ... 162, 142 So. 592; Henly v. State, 21 Ala.App. 259, ... 107 So ... ...
-
Hubbard v. State
...of the crime. Brown et al. v. State, 31 Ala.App. 529, 19 So.2d 88; Bradley v. State, 19 Ala.App. 578, 99 So. 321; Morris v. State, 25 Ala.App. 156, 142 So. 592. Justice Thomas, writing for the Supreme Court in Skumro v. State, 234 Ala. 4, 170 So. 776, 778, stated the doctrine in this langua......
-
Banks v. State
...]. As discussed above, we cannot say this would not be the result if the evidence were before the jury. See also, Morris v. State, 25 Ala.App. 156, 142 So. 592 [ (1932) ]; Grissett v. State, 18 Ala.App. 675, 94 So. 271 [ (1922) ]; affirmed Ex parte State, 208 Ala. 439, 94 So. 274 [ (1922) 4......