Morris v. State

Decision Date10 October 1956
Citation91 So.2d 640
PartiesCharles MORRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida and Nathan Mayo, as Custodian of the Florida State Prison, Appellee.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Charles Morris, in pro. per.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Reeves Bowen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the Rules of this Court and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record that said Motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

THOMAS, Acting Chief Justice, and ROBERTS, THORNAL and BUFORD, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Morris v. Mayo
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • April 14, 1960
    ...used force. The Circuit Court denied the writ. The Supreme Court of Florida affirmed the judgment and denied a rehearing. Morris v. State, Fla., 1956, 91 So.2d 640. The Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari. Morris v. State of Florida, 1957, 352 U.S. 1009, 77 S.Ct. 576, 1 L.E......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT