Morrison v. Snow
Decision Date | 01 July 1903 |
Docket Number | 1460 |
Citation | 72 P. 924,26 Utah 247 |
Court | Utah Supreme Court |
Parties | C. D. MORRISON, Respondent, v. ALVIRAS E. SNOW, L. W. SNOW, MORTON FRENCH and THE MORRISON MINING COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellants, and GEORGE W. BARTCH, Respondent |
Appeal from the Third District Court, Salt Lake County.--Hon. W. C Hall, Judge.
Action to set aside and rescind a contract which the complaint alleges plaintiff, through certain false and fraudulent representations made to him by defendant, Alviras E. Snow was induced to enter into, whereby he sold to Snow for a nominal consideration 145,000 shares of the capital stock of the Morrison Mining Company; for an injunction restraining the defendants, L. W. Snow and Morton French, from disposing of the stock, which, it is alleged, they hold in trust for said Alviras E. Snow, and to compel them to deliver up for cancellation the certificates representing the stock; and to compel the Morrison Mining Company to reissue the said stock to plaintiff. From a decree in favor of the plaintiff, and from a decree striking certain scandalous matter from the records of the court, the defendants appealed.
AFFIRMED.
W. H Wilkins, Esq., and J. M. Bowman, Esq., for appellants.
Messrs. Dickson, Ellis & Ellis for respondent.
Messrs. Powers, Straup & Lippman for respondent Bartch.
OPINION
STATEMENT OF FACTS.
This action is brought, first, to have rescinded and set aside a written contract which the complaint alleges plaintiff, through certain false and fraudulent representations made to him by defendant Alviras E. Snow, was induced to enter into, whereby he sold and delivered to Snow for a nominal consideration 145,000 shares of the capital stock of the Morrison Mining Company, of the value of $ 7,250; second, for an injunction restraining the defendants L. W. Snow and Morton French from disposing of the stock, it being alleged that they are holding it in trust for Alviras E. Snow; and, third, for a decree compelling them to deliver up for cancellation the certificates representing the stock, and that the Morrison Mining Company be directed to reissue the stock to plaintiff. There is a conflict in the testimony on some of the issues, but the following facts are supported by a clear preponderance of the evidence:
On April 12, 1900, at Humboldt, Nevada, plaintiff and defendant Alviras E. Snow entered into the following contract in writing: At the time of making the contract Morrison and Snow agreed that they would not dispose of the stock held by them individually, but would sell the treasury stock to raise funds with which to work and develop the mines mentioned in the contract. The reason assigned for making this agreement was that to put their own stock on the market would interfere with the sale of the treasury stock.
Morrison was in the constant and continuous employ of the railroad company at Humboldt as a car repairer and inspector of trains. The rules of the company prevented him from actively engaging in business on his own account. He therefore had neither the time nor opportunity to promote and organize a company to develop the property. Snow resided in Salt Lake City, Utah and was engaged in mining and in promoting mining enterprises. About April 20, 1900, Morrison, in compliance with the terms of his agreement with Snow, executed and delivered to Snow a quitclaim deed to the mines in question. Snow took charge of the property, and his first move toward organizing a company was to approach and get interested in the enterprise several prominent and influential men of this State, among whom were Justice Bartch, Justice Miner, Judge Rolapp, H. B. Clawson, and Ezra Thompson, mayor of Salt Lake City. According to his own testimony, as shown by the record, Snow bargained and sold to these gentlemen, and other parties who were to come into the company, 70,000 shares in the aggregate of his own stock, at two cents per share, to be issued and delivered on the completion of the organization of the company. After the sale of this stock, and before the company was organized, Snow informed Morrison that he gave the parties mentioned their stock to induce them to come into the company. The articles of incorporation were signed, and the organization of the company completed, March 6, 1901, with its principal place of business at Salt Lake City, Utah. Morrison and Snow were made members of the board of directors. All of the directors, except Morrison, resided in Salt Lake City. Snow was made secretary and treasurer, and continued to manage and direct the affairs of the company. Snow occasionally received samples of ore from the mine, and kept himself well posted as to its appearance and condition, and as to the value of the ore taken therefrom. On the 7th day of May, 1901, a Mr. Baldwin, who was a practical mining man, went, in company with Snow, and made an examination of the property, and took therefrom eight samples of ore, which he assayed, and on the 14th day of May, 1901, made the following concise report of the appearance and condition of the mine and the character of the ore it was producing:
The result of these and other assays that Snow had made of the ores taken from the mine, after he assumed control, were never communicated to Morrison, who had no information as to the actual value of the ore. The distance from Salt Lake City to Humboldt is about 500 miles, making it both expensive and inconvenient for Morrison to make frequent visits to look after his interests, and, as shown by the record, he not only expected, but trusted to, Snow to attend to and look after the business of the company. Snow, whose duty it was, as secretary of the company, to notify the several directors of board meetings, never sent Morrison but one notice of a board meeting, and on this occasion he wrote Morrison, if he could not come, to put his views in writing, which Morrison did. Snow knew that Morrison was placing the utmost confidence in him, and expecting him to attend to and take care of his interests and that of the company. Their correspondence, which is too voluminous to produce here in full, shows this fact. On June 18, 1901, Morrison wrote to Snow, in part, as follows: In answer to this letter Snow, on July 1, 1901, wrote to Morrison as follows: On July 3, 1901, Morrison wrote to Snow, and informed him that he was not prepared to pay an assessment, and that he would let Snow have his 150,000 shares of stock for $ 1,500.
Soon...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ex parte Marshall
...and 103; State ex rel. Jones v. Laughlin, 73 Mo. 443; Winkelman v. People, 50 Ill. 449; Mattler v. Schaffner, 53 Ind. 245; Morrison v. Snow, 26 Utah 247, 72 P. 924; People v. Goodrich, 79 Ill. 148; In Darrow, 175 Ind. 44, 92 N.E. 369; and in re Ebbs, 150 N.C. 44, 63 S.E. 190, 19 L.R.A. (N.S......
-
In Re Charles A. Thatcher
...270; Smith's Appeal, 179 Pa. 14; People, ex rel. Moses v. Goodrich, 79 Ill. 148; People, ex rel. Morris v. Moutray, 166 Ill. 630; Morrison v. Snow, 26 Utah 247; State, ex rel. McCormick v. Winton, 11 Ore., 456; In re Percy, 36 N.Y. 651; State of Florida, ex rel. Wolfe v. Kirke, 12 Fla. 278;......
-
Poff v. Scales
...such contempt and does not disqualify him from taking action in regard to such contempt. (Const. Ida., art. 5, sec. 13; Morrison v. Snow, 26 Utah 247, 72 P. 924; In Snow, 27 Utah 265, 75 P. 741; Ropes v. Stewart, 54 Fla. 185, 45 So. 31; Kelley v. Boettcher, 85 F. 55, 29 C. C. A. 14; Kruegel......
-
Mississippi State Bar Ass'n v. Wade, 43127
...33, 103; State ex rel. Jones v. Laughlin, 73 Mo. 443; Winkelman v. People, 50 Ill. 449; Mattler v. Schaffner, 53 Ind. 245; Morrison v. Snow, 26 Utah. 247, 72 P. 924; People ex rel. Moses v. Goodrich, 79 Ill. 148; In re Darrow, 175 Ind. 44, 92 N.E. 369; and In re Ebbs, 150 N.C. 44, 63 S.E. 1......