Morrow v. Zane
Decision Date | 14 November 1914 |
Docket Number | No. 1375.,1375. |
Citation | 185 Mo. App. 111,170 S.W. 918 |
Parties | MORROW et al. v. ZANE. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
After property was acquired by a husband and wife as an estate in entirety, the wife incurred indebtedness. Thereafter the husband conveyed his interest to her. Held, that the wife could not assert a homestead exemption in the interest acquired after the indebtedness was incurred, for Rev. St. 1909, § 6711, makes a homestead subject to levy and execution upon a cause of action existing at the time of its acquisition.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jasper County; David E. Blair, Judge.
Action by S. O. Morrow and others against Emma Zane. There was a judgment for plaintiffs, and on defendant's motion execution was quashed. From an order denying a motion to set aside the order quashing the execution, plaintiffs appeal. Reversed and remanded.
On November 29, 1912, F. H. Zane and Emma Zane, the defendant, acquired an estate by the entirety in 80 acres of land in Jasper county by warranty deed conveying it to them as husband and wife, which deed was recorded on December 7, 1912. On the date the deed was made, they placed a mortgage on the land for $3,500, and later, on December 16, 1912, placed a second mortgage on the land for $400. Long prior to November 29, 1912, F. H. Zane, the husband, was indebted to the plaintiffs for the debt concerning which this litigation arises. On December 26, 1912, this debt of F. H. Zane was evidenced by a note given for $2,762.81 signed by himself and Emma Zane, the defendant, and it was on this date (December 26, 1912) that the defendant first became indebted to the plaintiffs. On February 6, 1913, Zane and the defendant moved onto the 80 acres and began to occupy the same as the home for the family. On May 17, 1913, F. H. Zane made a warranty deed to the defendant (his wife) for his interest in the 80 acres; the consideration recited being "the sum of one dollar, love and affection, and other valuable consideration" (shown further on to be $1,500 owing from the husband to the defendant). This deed was made subject to the first and second mortgages aggregating $3,900 which the defendant assumed and agreed to pay.
On August 18, 1913, F. H. Zane went into bankruptcy. In his schedule of assets he did not list any interest in the 80 acres. This debt to the plaintiffs was listed. On the sheet in the schedule providing for any claim the bankrupt may have on which to claim his exemptions appears the following:
The trustee in bankruptcy set aside to the bankrupt the 80 acres of land as his homestead. Exceptions to the action of the trustee in this regard were filed by the plaintiffs and other creditors, and at the time of the trial of this case the exceptions were still pending in the bankruptcy court and undisposed of.
At the February term, 1914, the plaintiffs commenced suit against Emma Zane on the note of December 26, 1912, and in March following, when the case came on for hearing, judgment was rendered in plaintiffs' favor against Emma Zane for the sum of $2,934.57, the amount of the note with interest to the date of judgment, and for costs, and that execution issue therefor.
The sheriff served on Emma Zane, the defendant, a notice of her exemptions as required by statute. Emma Zane then filed with the sheriff a written notice of claim of homestead, which claim described the real estate above referred to, and set out that the equity therein was less than the $1,500 homestead right under the statutes of the state of Missouri; that said homestead rights in the 80 acres of land were acquired by her on November 29, 1912; and she claimed the same as exempt. The sheriff upon the instruction of the plaintiffs and without appraisement or any other proceedings advertised the property for sale. The defendant then filed a motion to quash the levy, which motion was based upon the following grounds: (1) The sheriff of Jasper county had levied upon and advertised for sale the exempt homestead of the defendant. (2) The sheriff, after serving upon defendant notice of exemption and receiving from defendant her claim of exemptions specifying the homestead, levied upon as exempt, advertised the same for sale. (3) The sheriff failed to comply with the provisions of article 18 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri, with reference to execution exemptions and sale of property. (4) The sheriff in levying on defendant's...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ahmann v. Kemper
...185 Mo. 518; State ex rel. Schwettman v. Oberheide, 39 S.W.2d 397; Luster v. Cook, 297 S.W. 459; McClure v. Virden, 70 F.2d 724; Morrow v. Zane, 185 Mo.App. 111. (c) title to land is acquired prior to the inception of the debt, and the land is occupied as a homestead by a householder at the......
-
Ahmann v. Kemper, 35223.
...of her husband, E.J. Summers. Secs. 608, 2998, R.S. 1929; Clark v. Thais, 173 Mo. 628; Gorman v. Hale, 109 Mo. App. 176; Morrow v. Zane, 185 Mo. App. 111, 170 S.W. 918; Kendall v. Powers, 96 Mo. 142; Rouse v. Caton, 168 Mo. 296; Peake v. Cameron, 102 Mo. 574; Brown v. Brown, Admr., 68 Mo. 3......
- Morrow v. Zane