Morse v. Rogers

Decision Date23 October 1875
Citation118 Mass. 572
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
PartiesCharles P. Morse & another v. Thomas M. Rogers

[Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material]

Worcester. Tort for the disturbance of an easement. Trial in the Superior Court, before Dewey, J., who, after a verdict for the plaintiffs, reported the case to this court in substance as follows:

The defendant owns a lot of land with a block of buildings thereon in Worcester, on the corner of Main and Pleasant Streets, on the northerly side of Pleasant Street. The plaintiffs own the lot on the northerly side of Pleasant Street, next westerly of the defendant's lot. Between the two lots is a passage way, extending from Pleasant Street between the plaintiffs' and the defendant's lots, and further north to Pearl Street. The boundary of said passage way was in controversy.

Charles Paine formerly owned all the lots marked from 1 to 9 inclusive on the plan, a copy of which was put in evidence and is printed in the margin, [*] and all the land covered by the passage ways on said plan, and in 1865 sold them at auction to various parties, and on December 1, 1865, made conveyances of the several lots to the purchasers. The plaintiffs and the defendant took their respective titles from Paine's grantees, and the questions raised in this report arise on the deeds from Paine. The deed from Paine of the plaintiffs' lot bounds it as follows: "Beginning at a point in the northerly line of said Pleasant Street, which is one hundred and ten feet and six inches westerly from the intersection of said northerly line of Pleasant Street with the westerly line of Main Street, and which point is also the point where said northerly line of Pleasant Street is intersected by the westerly line of a passage way fifteen feet in width, running from Pearl Street to Pleasant Street, the easterly line of which passage way is the westerly line of Calvin Foster's lot, upon which his brick block stands, and a line drawn in extension of said westerly line to said Pleasant Street; thence northerly by the westerly line of said passage way, seventy-nine feet, to a point where the westerly line of said passage way is intersected by the southerly line of a passage way twelve feet in width, running from said fifteen foot passage way westerly to land of George A. Bates; thence westerly by the southerly line of said twelve foot passage way, thirty-four feet, to a point which is the northeasterly corner of land this day conveyed by me to John G. Kendall; thence southerly by land so conveyed to said Kendall, eighty feet, to the northerly line of said Pleasant Street; thence easterly by the westerly line of said Pleasant Street, thirty-one feet, to the place of beginning. Being lot numbered 6 on plan, dated 'Worcester, November 24, 1865,' and to be recorded. Together with a right of way in common with others, to whom estates have been conveyed by me, over the above named passage ways as laid down and shown on said plan."

The deed from Paine of the defendant's lot contained the following as the description: "Beginning at the northeasterly corner thereof at a point in the westerly line of said Main Street, exactly opposite the centre of the brick wall which divides the store on the premises hereby conveyed from the store next adjoining on the north; thence running westerly in a straight line through the centre of said brick wall, one hundred feet, to the easterly side of a passage way fifteen feet in width running from Pearl Street to Pleasant Street, the easterly line of which passage way is the westerly line of Calvin Foster's lot, upon which his brick block stands, and a line drawn in extension thereof to said Pleasant Street; thence southerly by the easterly line of said passage way, forty-one feet and six inches, to the northerly line of said Pleasant Street; thence easterly by the northerly line of said Pleasant Street, ninety-five feet and six inches, to a point where said northerly line of said Pleasant Street is intersected by the westerly line of said Main Street; thence by the westerly line of said Main Street northerly, twenty feet and ten inches, to the place of beginning. Being lot numbered 5 on a plan dated Worcester, November 24, 1865, and to be recorded. Together with a right of way in common with others, to whom estates have been conveyed by me, over the above named passage way as laid down and shown on said plan."

Each of the other deeds of the other lots referred to said passage way as a "passage way fifteen feet in width running from Pearl Street to Pleasant Street, the easterly line of which passage way is the westerly line of Calvin Foster's lot, upon which his brick block stands, and a line drawn in extension of said westerly line to said Pleasant Street," and each of said deeds contained the phrase, "Together with a right in common with others, to whom estates have been conveyed by me, over the above named passage way as laid down and shown in said plan."

The distances given in each of the Paine deeds correspond with the figures on said plan. Before the action was brought, the defendant built a brick block, four stories high, on his lot and extending back on the northerly line of Pleasant Street ninety-eight feet and three inches from the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Holmes v. Barrett
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • January 6, 1930
    ...of Long Wharf, 5 Pick. 131, 138;Clark v. Munyan, 22 Pick. 410, 416,33 Am. Dec. 752;White v. Bliss, 8 Cush. 510, 512;Morse v. Rogers, 118 Mass. 572, 578.Temple v. Benson, 213 Mass. 128, 132, 100 N. E. 63;Van Ness v. Boinay, 214 Mass. 340, 101 N. E. 979;Webber v. Cox, 256 Mass. 595, 153 N. E.......
  • Yanish v. Tarbox
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • April 7, 1892
    ... ... govern, and cannot be controlled or effected by parol ... evidence. Linscott v. Fernald, 5 Greenl. 496; ... Bell v. Morse, 6 N.H. 205; Clark v. Baird, ... 9 N.Y. 183; Clark v. Wethey, 19 Wend. 320 ...          Chas ... N. Bell and George E. Budd, for ... distances. 3 Washb. Real Prop. p. 631; Haynes v ... Young, 36 Me. 557; Keenan v ... Cavanaugh, 44 Vt. 268; Morse v ... Rogers", 118 Mass. 572; Cunningham v ... Curtis, 57 N.H. 157; Watson v ... Jones, 85 Pa. 117; Muhlker v ... Ruppert, 124 N.Y. 627, (26 N.E. 313.) ... \xC2" ... ...
  • McMahon v. Blanchard
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • November 27, 1928
    ...that not measurements, but monuments when certain, or capable of being made certain, are to govern in the construction of deeds. Morse v. Rogers, 118 Mass. 572;Stefanick v. Fortona, 222 Mass. 83, 85, 109 N. E. 878. In the light of all the material circumstances, the easterly passageway may ......
  • Marvel v. Regienus
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • November 6, 1952
    ...It does not appear in the instant case that the line of the cleared land as it existed in 1905 could not be found, see Morse v. Rogers, 118 Mass. 572, 578, because the auditor has been able to find it. There is nothing in his report which convinces us that he did not have sufficient evidenc......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT