Morton & Oxley, Ltd. v. Charles S. Eby, M.D., P.A., 2D04-2690.
Decision Date | 29 April 2005 |
Docket Number | No. 2D04-2690.,2D04-2690. |
Parties | MORTON & OXLEY, LTD., and Greg Mayer, as an individual and Trustee, Appellants, v. CHARLES S. EBY, M.D., P.A., Dermatologic and Cosmetic Surgery Center, LC, a Florida limited corporation, Charles S. Eby, M.D., as an individual, Jean B. Eby, as an individual, and Does 1-100, inclusive, Appellees. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Frank R. Bodor, Warren, OH, and James P. Hayes, Largo, for Appellants.
J. Michael Coleman and Michael L. Michetti of Conroy, Coleman & Hazzard, P.A., for Appellee Jean B. Eby.
No appearance for remaining Appellees.
Appellants, defendants below, Morton & Oxley, Ltd., and Greg Mayer, an officer of Morton & Oxley, Ltd. (collectively the Trustee), challenge three nonfinal orders in this action dealing with the alleged misappropriation of trust assets. We have jurisdiction to review the "Order on Jean Eby and Charles Ebys' Motion to Release Money Held in Court Registry to Pay Taxes" as an order determining the right to the immediate possession of property, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ii), and we affirm that order without comment.
The Trustee also seeks review of the "Order on Defendants' Motion to Order Removal of Funds in Clerk's Custody and Return and Post Same to Trust Accounts." The trial court characterized the motion as a motion for rehearing of the court's earlier order granting a temporary injunction1 and denied the motion. We agree with the trial court's characterization and further note that an order denying a motion for rehearing of an interlocutory order is a nonappealable order. See Solman-Staropoli v. Califano, 645 So.2d 84, 84 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) ( ); see also Richardson v. Watson, 611 So.2d 1254, 1255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) ( ). Thus, we dismiss the appeal as to the order denying, what is in effect, the Trustee's motion for rehearing.
Finally, the Trustee challenges the "Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint For Failure to Name Indispensable Parties and Because Plaintiffs Have No Standing." The trial court denied the motion without prejudice. The denial of a motion to dismiss a complaint is a nonfinal order, and the denial of a motion to dismiss for failure to name indispensable parties or for lack of standing is not listed as an appealable nonfinal order in rule 9.130(a). See Supal v. Pelot, 469 So.2d 949 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985) ( ).
Certiorari review may be available in limited circumstances with regard to nonfinal orders, Reeves v. Fleetwood Homes of Fla., Inc., 889 So.2d 812, 822 (Fla.2004), including to review orders on motions to dismiss for failure to join indispensable parties. See, e.g., Fresh Del Monte Produce, N.V. v. Chiquita Int'l Ltd., 664 So.2d 263, 264 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Mantis v. Hinckley, 547 So.2d 292, 293 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). However, to obtain relief from an interlocutory order a party must establish "`(1) a departure from the essential requirements of the law, (2) resulting in material injury for the remainder of the case (3) that cannot be corrected on postjudgment appeal.'" Reeves, 889 So.2d at 822 (quoting Bd. of Regents v. Snyder, 826 So.2d 382, 387 (Fla. 2d DCA...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lennar Homes, LLC v. Mart. At the Oasis Neighborhood Ass'n, Inc.
...appeal of nonfinal orders that "determine... the entitlement of a party to arbitration"); Morton & Oxley, Ltd. v. Charles S. Eby, M.D., P.A., 916 So. 2d 820, 821 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) ("The denial of a motion to dismiss a complaint is a nonfinal order, and the denial of a motion to dismiss for......
-
Blades v. State, Dept. of Revenue
...law, (2) resulting in material injury for the remainder of the case (3) that cannot be corrected on postjudgment appeal.'" Morton & Oxley, Ltd., 916 So.2d at 822 (quoting Bd. of Regents v. Snyder, 826 So.2d 382, 387 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)). The unfortunate circumstance faced by the trial court ......
-
Hinckley v. Department of Revenue
...by postjudgment appeal. Thus, review is not available under our certiorari jurisdiction. See Morton & Oxley, Ltd. v. Charles S. Eby, M.D., P.A., 916 So.2d 820, 821-22 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Parkway Bank v. Fort Myers Armature Works, Inc., 658 So.2d 646, 648-49 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). As noted in T......
-
OMNI Healthcare, Inc. v. N. Brevard Cnty. Hosp. Dist.
... ... at Metrowest, Phases Six & Seven, Ltd., 909 So.2d ... 516, 517-18 (Fla. 5th DCA ... omitted); see also Morton & Oxley Ltd. v. Charles S ... Eby, M.D., ... ...