Morton Trust Co. v. Keith
Decision Date | 07 February 1907 |
Docket Number | 123. |
Citation | 150 F. 606 |
Parties | MORTON TRUST CO. et al. v. KEITH et al. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts |
Wm. C Strawbridge, for complainants.
Kay Totten & Winter, for defendants.
This was a bill in equity, to which the defendant duly answered. After the proofs had been completed, but before the case was set down for hearing, the complainant moved to dismiss the bill without prejudice upon payment of costs. The defendant objected to the decree in the usual form, and submitted a draft as follows:
The defendant does not deny the complainant's abstract right to dismiss the bill without prejudice upon payment of costs but insists that, in thus dismissing the bill, the court has authority to impose such terms as it deems just and convenient. In support of this proposition, he cites Brush v. Condit (C.C.) 20 F. 826, American Zylonite Co. v. Celluloid Mfg. Co. (C.C.) 32 F. 809, and American Steel & Wire Co. v. Mayer & Englund Co. (C.C.) 123 F. 204. A decree in the form which he seeks...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Young v. J. Samuels & Bro., Inc.
...American Steel & Wire Co. v. Mayer (C.C.) 123 F. 204. The decisions in the First circuit, however, are to the contrary: Morton Trust Co. v. Keith (C.C.) 150 F. 606; Pennsylvania Globe Gaslight Co. v. Globe Gaslight (C.C.) 121 F. 1015. In both of these cases the proofs had been completed. Se......
-
Greenville Banking & Trust Co. v. Selcow
...v. Detroit City Railway Co. (C. C.) 55 F. 569; Pennsylvania Globe Gaslight Co. v. Globe Gaslight Co. (C. C.) 121 F. 1015; Morton Trust Co. v. Keith (C. C.) 150 F. 606; Cowham v. McNider (D. C.) 261 F. 714; Goldstein v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. (C. C. A.) 17 F.(2d) 482; Pullman......
-
Whitall-Tatum v. Corning Glass Works
...where there is a cross-bill." Pennsylvania Globe Gaslight Co. v. Globe Gaslight Co. (C. C.) 121 F. 1015, 1016. In Morton Trust Co. et al. v. Keith et al. (C. C.) 150 F. 606, dismissal was permitted without condition and without prejudice after the proofs had been completed; in Connecticut &......
-
United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co. of New Jersey
... ... Houghton v. Whitin ... Machine Co. (C.C.) 160 F. 227; Morton Trust Co. v ... Keith (C.C.) 150 F. 606. Under the view of the United ... States a bill may be ... ...