Morton v. Califano

Decision Date09 June 1978
Docket NumberNo. CIV-2-77-133.,CIV-2-77-133.
Citation481 F. Supp. 908
PartiesRhea D. MORTON, Plaintiff, v. Joseph A. CALIFANO, Jr., etc., Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of Tennessee

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

Carleton W. Smith, Greeneville, Tenn. and Thomas D. Dossett, Kingsport, Tenn., for plaintiff.

John Cary, U. S. Atty., Knoxville, Tenn., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NEESE, District Judge.

This is an action for the judicial review of the final decision of the defendant Secretary, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), denying the plaintiff's claim for widow's insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C. §§ 402(e), 423(d)(2)(B). The defendant moved for a judgment on the pleadings. Rule 12(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1

The plaintiff filed an application for such benefits on June 17, 1976, alleging that she had been unable to engage in gainful activity all of her life because of a heart condition, nerve trouble, and a thyroid disorder. That claim was denied initially and on reconsideration. An administrative law judge also denied that application on May 26, 1977, and this became the final decision of the defendant Secretary when an appeals council approved it.

The administrative law judge found, inter alia:

* * * * * *
3. The specified period during which the plaintiff may establish that she is under a "disability" extends beyond the date of this decision.
4. The * * * plaintiff experiences an emotional disorder and periodic gastrointestinal discomfort.
5. The * * * attendant medical findings with respect to any of the above impairments, as recited in the Listing of Impairments in the Appendix to Subpart P of Social Security Administration Regulation No. 4 for such impairments are not present.
6. The * * * medical findings with respect to the plaintiff's impairments are not equivalent in severity and duration to the listed findings of any impairment listed in the Appendix to Subpart P. Therefore, the plaintiff's impairments, considered singly and in combination, are not medically the equivalent of the listed impairments.
7. * * * Prior to the date of this decision * * * the plaintiff's impairments were not of the level of severity which, under Regulations prescribed by the Secretary, is deemed sufficient to preclude an individual from engaging in any gainful activity.
* * * * * *

Such findings by the Secretary are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence in this record. Wokojance v. Weinberger, C.A. 6th (1975), 513 F.2d 210, 212 3. The Court may determine only whether the Secretary's decision is based upon such evidence. LeMaster v. Weinberger, C.A. 6th (1976), 533 F.2d 337, 339 1; Ingram v. Richardson, C.A. 6th (1972), 471 F.2d 1268, 1271 4. "* * * We have defined `substantial evidence' as `such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.' Consolidated Edison Co. v. Labor Board 1938, 305 U.S. 197, 229 59 S.Ct. 206, 217, 83 L.Ed. 126. `It must be enough to justify, if the trial were to a jury, a refusal to direct a verdict when the conclusion sought to be drawn from it is one of fact for the jury.' Labor Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co. 1939, 306 U.S. 292, 300 59 S.Ct. 501, 505, 83 L.Ed. 660, 665. * * *" Consolo v. Federal Maritime Com. (1966), 383 U.S. 607, 619-620, 86 S.Ct. 1018, 1026, 16 L.Ed.2d 131, 140-141 9.

To qualify for benefits as a disabled widow, the plaintiff must have established that she was at least 50 years of age but, not 60; that she was the widow of a wage-earner who died fully insured; and that she had physical or mental impairments which, under regulations promulgated by the Secretary, was deemed to be of such severity as to preclude her from engaging in any gainful activity. 42 U.S.C. §§ 402(e), 423(d)(2)(B). Sullivan v. Weinberger, C.A. 5th (1974), 493 F.2d 855, 857 1, certiorari denied (1975), 421 U.S. 967, 95 S.Ct. 1958, 44 L.Ed.2d 455; Barnes v. Richardson, D.C. Tenn. (1970), 322 F.Supp. 699, 700 1, 2; Henry v. Richardson, D.C.Tenn. (1970), 320 F.Supp. 296. The plaintiff was required also to have shown that her impairments became manifest within 7 years from the month of the insured wage-earner's death. Sullivan v. Weinberger, supra.

The test of disability for a widow claiming benefits is more stringent than that for a wage-earner. A widow must have established her inability to engage in any gainful activity, 42 U.S.C. § 423 (d)(2)(B), while a wage-earner need establish only his inability to engage in substantial gainful activity, 42 U.S.C. § 423(d)(1)(A). Furthermore, nonmedical factors, such as age, education and work experience, are not considered in adjudicating a widow's claim. Sullivan v. Weinberger, supra, 493 F.2d at 862 10.

Pursuant to the authority delegated by the Congress in the 1967 amendments to Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423(d)(2)(B), the Secretary prescribed a listing of medical impairments which he deemed to be sufficiently severe to preclude an individual from engaging in any gainful activity. This listing was adopted as part of the Social Security Administration regulation no. 4, § 404.1501, et seq., as appendix to subpart P (Appendix to 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1501, et seq.).

Section 404.1504 of the Social Security Administration regulations no. 4, 20 C.F.R. § 404.1504, provides that a widow may be found to be under a disability only if her impairment(s) are either listed in such appendix or are, singly or in combination, medically the equivalent of an impairment listed in the appendix. Thereunder, medical findings must be demonstrated by medically acceptable clinical and laboratory diagnostic techniques; and on the question of medical equivalence, the record must include a medical judgment furnished by one or more physicians designated by the Secretary. 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1505 and 404.1506.

The plaintiff Mrs. Rhea D. Morton was born on March 28, 1920. The wage-earner, her deceased husband, Mr. Brownie E. Morton, died on June 5, 1976. Mrs. Morton has not remarried.

Mrs. Morton complained of a heart condition stemming from a childhood bout with rheumatic fever. Section 4.00B of the appendix to subpart P of the aforementioned regulations no. 4 states that "* * * congestive heart failure is not considered to be established for the purpose of § 4.02 unless there is evidence * * * of signs of vascular congestion such as hepatomegaly, peripheral or pulmonary edema as well as other appropriate findings. * * *" Dr. John B. McKinnon, an internist who examined the plaintiff on September 13, 1976, stated in his report that "* * * she has no significant pain, dyspnea, or any other symptoms of congestive heart failure. * * *" He reported further that "* * * the baseline electrocardiogram was normal with no evidence of any old myocardial disease, * * *" and that the plaintiff's heart was not enlarged.

The plaintiff alleged disability because of a thyroid disorder. She underwent a thyroidectomy sometime in the 1950's. Section 9.00 concerns problems with the endocrine system. Section 9.00A states that "* * * disability is caused by overproduction or underproduction of hormones resulting in structural and/or functional changes in the body. * * *" The medical evidence of record herein includes no mention of any continuing problem in this area.

Mrs. Morton also complains of a mental disorder. She alleges that she has suffered 5 nervous breakdowns, but there is no record that she received any psychiatric treatment. The pertinent regulation provides as follows:

* * * * * *
12.04 Functional nonpsychotic disorders (psychophysiologic, psychoneurotic and personality disorders, drug addiction and alcoholism). Manifested by marked restriction of daily activities and constriction of interests and deterioration in personal habits and seriously impaired ability to relate to other people and persistence of one of the following:
A. Demonstrable structural changes mediated through psychophysiological or channels (e. g., duodenal ulcer); or
B. Recurrent and persistent periods of anxiety, with tension, apprehension, and interference with concentration and memory; or
C. Persistent depressive affect with insomnia, loss of weight, and suicidal ideation; or
D. Phobic or obsessive ruminations with inappropriate, bizarre, or disruptive behavior; or
E. Compulsive, ritualistic behavior; or
F. Persistent functional disturbance of vision, speech, hearing, or use of a limb with demonstrable structural or trophic changes; or
G. Long-lasting, habitual, or inappropriate patterns of behavior manifested by one of the following:
1. Seclusiveness and autistic thinking; or
2. Antisocial or amoral behavior (including pathologic sexuality) manifested by: (a) inability to learn from experience and inability to conform with accepted social standards, leading to repeated conflicts with society or authority and (b) by psychopathology documented by mental status examination and the results of appropriate, standardized psychological tests; or
3. Pathologically inappropriate suspiciousness or hostility manifested by psychopathology documented by mental status examination and the results of appropriate, standardized psychological tests.
* * * * * *

20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1501, et seq., appendix to subpart P.

Dr. William Wiley, a psychiatrist, examined Mrs. Morton on September 1, 1976. In his report of September 8, he commented on the plaintiff's ability to function in family and work environments, as follows:

* * * * * *
There has been a significant reduction in this patient's daily activities. She has not been able to perform all her house work for some time. She is able to relate well to relatives and friends in social situations. She would be able to relate to and communicate with supervisors and co-workers in a work situation. She does possess the basic educational competence to perform simple arithmetic computations and read. She would be able to understand, remember and carry out simple
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • Nelson v. Berryhill
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • February 7, 2018
    ...than the pleadings and the transcript of the record before the agency,' and may not admit additional evidence. Morton v. Califano, 481 F.Supp. 908, 914 n. 2 (E.D. Tenn. 1978); 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). "[A]lthough summary judgment motions are customarily used [in social security cases], and even ......
  • Hamilton v. Secretary of Health & Human Services of U.S., 91-3160
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • April 17, 1992
    ...enter either judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c) or an order pursuant to a motion under Rule 7(b)(1)); Morton v. Califano, 481 F.Supp. 908, 914 n. 2 (E.D.Tenn.1978) (although frequently used as a procedural device, summary judgment "is not technically correct or necessary under ... 4......
  • Nasery v. Colvin
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • August 4, 2017
    ...than the pleadings and the transcript of the record before the agency,' and may not admit additional evidence." Morton v. Califano, 481 F.Supp. 908, 914 n. 2 (E.D. Tenn.1978); 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). . . . [A]lthough summary judgment motions are customarily used [in social security cases], and ......
  • Pena v. Berryhill, Case No.: 3:17-cv-01822-AJB-KSC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • July 30, 2018
    ...than the pleadings and the transcript of the record before the agency,' and may not admit additional evidence." Morton v. Califano, 481 F.Supp. 908, 914 n. 2 (E.D. Tenn. 1978); 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). "[A]lthough summary judgment motions are customarily used [in social security cases], and even......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT