Morton v. State

Decision Date30 June 1921
Docket Number6 Div. 272
Citation206 Ala. 300,89 So. 655
PartiesMORTON v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; Dan A. Green, Judge.

Will Morton was convicted of robbery, and sentenced to death, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Lamar Field, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

THOMAS, J.

The indictment was for robbery. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment of conviction, and imposition of the death penalty.

The only exception reserved and presented by the appeal is whether the lower court committed error in admitting evidence of a confession by defendant. It is unnecessary to discuss the rule governing admission in evidence of confessions of a defendant in a criminal case. In Curry v. State, 203 Ala. 239, 242, 82 So. 489, 492, the court said:

"It is settled law that, when a confession is offered in evidence against a defendant in criminal trial, the duty devolves upon the court to ascertain and declare by its ruling whether or not such confession was free and voluntary. When confessions have been admitted as evidence against a defendant's objection, the presumption is in favor of the correctness of the ruling of the trial court, on appeal, and reversal will not be had because of the admission of such evidence, unless the record affirmatively shows that manifest error was committed in the admission of such evidence. Price v. State, 117 Ala. 113, 23 So. 691; Wilson v. State, 191 Ala. 7, 67 So. 1010; Sharp v. State, 193 Ala. 22, 26, 69 So. 123." Godau v. State, 179 Ala. 27, 41, 60 So. 908.

An examination of the record discloses no error of the trial court. The circumstances and the testimony of several witnesses showed the confession to have been voluntary. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Jarvis v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • January 25, 1930
    ...State, 204 Ala. 687, 87 So. 177; Stone v. State, 208 Ala. 50, 93 So. 706, Birchfield v. State, 217 Ala. 225, 115 So. 297; Morton v. State, 206 Ala. 300, 89 So. 655; v. State, 207 Ala. 179, 184, 93 So. 293, 24 A. L. R. 1359; Cunningham v. State, 207 Ala. 433, 93 So. 446; McCullars v. State, ......
  • Lambert v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • May 13, 1937
    ... ... evidence after due predicates were laid. Fincher v ... State, 211 Ala. 388, 100 So. 657; Curry v ... State, 203 Ala. 239, 82 So. 489; Stone v ... State, 208 Ala. 50, 93 So. 706; Huffman v ... State, 130 Ala. 89, 30 So. 394; Morton v ... State, 206 Ala. 300, 89 So. 655; Elmore v ... State, 223 Ala. 490, 137 So. 185 ... It was ... proper to allow the witness Dr. D.D. Cole, after his ... qualification as an expert, to express an opinion upon the ... established facts as to the cause of decedent's death ... ...
  • Wenske v. Salley
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • August 15, 1921
  • Wadsworth v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • January 10, 1922
    ... ... App.) ... 85 So. 869. The corpus delicti not having been proven, the ... confessions on this account were improperly admitted. They ... were shown, however, to have been voluntary, and a proper ... predicate was laid for their admission, had they been ... otherwise admissible. Morton v. State (Ala. Sup.) 89 ... Under ... all the evidence in this case, we are of the opinion that the ... defendant was entitled to the general affirmative charge ... requested by him ... The ... judgment of conviction is reversed, and the cause remanded ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT