Mosier v. Parry

Decision Date13 June 1899
Citation54 N.E. 364,60 Ohio St. 388
PartiesMOSIER et al. v. PARRY.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

Error to circuit court, Richland county.

Leonard L. Parry, defendant in error, brought action in the court of common pleas of Richland county against A. M. Mosier, M. D. Harter, L. F. Harrington, B. F. Platt, W. L. Leonard, M. B Bushnell, George W. Snyder, and W. A. Van Frank, as partners doing business under the firm name of the Mansfield Improvement Company, and individually, to recover for an alleged breach by them of a contract, a copy of which is as follows:

‘Memorandum of an agreement made this twenty-first day of September, A. D. 1893, by and between the following named persons: A. M Mosier, M. D. Harter, L. F. Harrington, B. F. Platt, W. L Leonard, M. B. Bushnell, George W. Snyder, and W. A. Van Frank, individually and as a partnership doing business under the name of the Mansfield Improvement Company, and A. J Twitchell and L. L. Parry, witnesseth: That whereas, the said parties hereto desire to organize a jointstock company to be incorporated under the laws of the state, to be located and have its principal place of business at Mansfield, in said state of Ohio, to be known as the Mansfield Stone and Sand Company; said company to be organized for the purpose of conducting the business of quarrying and selling stone and sand, also of working deposits of shale and selling the same. Said incorporated company is to be organized with a capital stock of $50,000. Fifty per cent. of each dollar of stock is to be paid up. Said incorporated company is to be organized as soon as possible, and the business for which it is organized is to be pushed forward as rapidly as possible until said company is put upon a working basis. It is hereby agreed by and between all parties hereto that the twelve-acre tract of land now occupied by L. L. Parry, lying in the southeast quarter of section 15, township 21, range 18 together with all the developments and improvements made thereon by the said Parry, shall be conveyed to said corporation by deed in fee simple. The said L. L. Parry shall be allowed and paid for his interest therein as follows: The sum of six thousand dollars, which is to be paid by said company to be formed to said L. L. Parry. which he agrees to dispose of as follows, to wit: Said $6,000 to be divided into two sums, $3,600 thereof, which said Parry is owing on said land, to said improvement company. Said new company shall pay as follows: $1,400 cash down. The remaining $2,200 it is expected the members of said improvement company will take in stock of said company to be formed, and George W. Snyder, M. B. Bushnell, B. F. Platt, and W. L. Leonard hereby agree to accept their portions thereof in stock, the interest of the other members of said improvement company in said $2,200 to be paid in stock or money, as may be hereafter determined. The balance of said $6,000, to wit, the sum of $2,400, said new company is to pay in capital stock, to wit, the sum of $4,800 in the capital stock of said company, which said Parry hereby agrees to dispose of as follows, to wit, to turn the same over to the several members of the said Mansfield Improvement Company, in consideration that they make no charge of interest against said sum of $3,600 owing said improvement company from said Parry. Further, that the said L. L. Parry is to be employed by said corporation to be formed as superintendent at a salary of sixty dollars per month for the first six months, said employment to date from the time when said property is turned over by said Parry to said company. It is further agreed by the parties hereto that the said L. L. Parry is to receive and to be paid as a compensation for the work done on said tract of land, and the development already made by him thereon, the sum of $6,000 in the capital stock of said new corporation to be formed. Further, that the said L. L. Parry is to receive and be paid for all machinery and tools owned or used by him belonging to said quarry as per an itemized list thereof hereto attached, marked ‘Exhibit A,’ the sum of three thousand dollars, to be paid in cash: provided, however, that the said Parry shall pay or cause to be paid all debts or claims owing thereon, or liens or claims against the same or any part of them, or, if not so paid, said company shall have the right to pay the same, and deduct the amount so paid from said amount to be paid Parry as aforesaid, and pay him the balance thereof. The said incorporated company to be formed is to pay to B. F. Platt and Charlotte Spice the sum of one thousand dollars as consideration for right of way for switch or railroad track across the lands of said Platt and Spice, as contracted for by said L. L. Parry with said Platt. Said company is also to pay to A. J. Twitchell, W. L. Leonard, and L. L. Parry the sum of one thousand dollars as consideration for damages to lots owned by them abutting on the north side of Vine street, in the city of Mansfield, occasioned by the running of said proposed switch or railroad track along the north line of said street, or, in lieu thereof, said corporation shall have the option of the purchase of said lots at the agreed price of $3,142.00, with interest from the date of this agreement. It is understood and agreed that this contract shall not invalidate the contract for the purchase of land by said Parry from the said Mansfield Improvement Company until said proposed company is fully organized, and the considerations herein stipulated for are paid according to the terms thereof; and when so paid and performed said Parry shall immediately turn over to said company all property herein stipulated to be sold by him. And the making of this contract shall not be considered in any way as an admission of the validity or invalidity of said contract between said Parry and said improvement company, and shall not, in any event, be taken and considered as such. It is further stipulated and agreed between all parties hereto that each and every person hereto shall give his utmost personal attention to the immediate formation of said proposed corporation, and perfecting the organization of the same, and for this purpose each person of this agreement pledges his hearty co-operation. It is understood and agreed by all parties hereto that said company shall be fully organized within thirty days from the date of this agreement. In testimony whereof, said parties have hereunto set their hands on this twenty-first day of September, A. D. 1893. Mansfield Improvement Company, by W. L. Leonard, Trustee. A. M. Mosier. Michael D. Harter. L. F. Harrington. B. F. Platt. W. L. Leonard. M. B. Bushnell. Geo. W. Snyder. A. J. Twitchell. Leonard L. Parry. W. A. Van Frank.'

In his petition, plaintiff averred that he was, at the making of the contract, possessed of the tract of land described therein and had opened and was working a valuable stone quarry thereon, and had made contracts with divers parties for a right of way for a switch from the main track of N.Y., P. & O. Railway to said quarry; also the owner of a large quantity of tools and machinery used in and about said quarry; all of which property rights, contracts, and developments defendants were desirous of being possessed of, and to effect that purpose entered into said contract. And, in consideration of plaintiff selling and transferring to defendants said land, they agreed to pay him $6,000, the sum of $3,600 to be paid to the Mansfield Improvement...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • New York Coal Co. v. New Pittsburgh Coal Co.
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • June 5, 1912
  • Lublinsussman Grp. LLP v. Lee
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • February 23, 2018
    ...intended to be accomplished, and the construction which the acts of the parties show they gave to their agreement." Mosier v. Parry , 60 Ohio St. 388, 401, 54 N.E. 364 (1899), paragraph one of the syllabus. However, when extrinsic evidence does not clarify the meaning of the contract, the c......
  • GHU Inv'rs, LLC v. Myocare Holdings, LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Ohio
    • October 4, 2022
    ...show they gave to their agreement.'” LublinSussman Grp. LLP v. Lee, 107 N.E.3d 724, 728 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018) (quoting Mosier v. Parry, 54 N.E. 364 (Ohio 1899)) (alteration in original); see also Graham, N.E.2d at 952. In addition, “[w]hen terms of an agreement are ambiguous, parol evidence ......
  • Commonwealth v. Hilton
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • June 30, 1899
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT