Moskos v. Hand, 70--362
Decision Date | 14 May 1971 |
Docket Number | No. 70--362,70--362 |
Parties | Nick MOSKOS, Appellant, v. Wilson B. HAND and Rena V. Hand, his wife, Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Ted P. Galatis of Galatis, Gorman & Feinstein, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Donald L. Burrie, Pompano Beach, for appellees.
This is a landlord tenant case with eviction being sought under the provisions of F.S. 83.21, Laws of 1969, F.S.A. The trial court entered a judgment on the pleadings in manner following:
'The plaintiffs request for an order of immediate possession is hereby denied due to the foregoing findings.'
We reverse.
The parties had a written lease agreement. Plaintiffs, the landlords, based their petition upon a failure of the defendant, tenant, to pay the December rent when due. The defendant's sworn answer reflected that he had paid and the landlords had accepted the next month's rent (January and that he had tardily tendered the December rent in the form of a Cashier's Check which the landlords held but refused to negotiate.
We believe the content of foregoing pleadings was of such nature as to make a justiciable issue in the areas of waiver and estoppel adequate to bar a judgment on the pleadings. As a general rule a lessor is estopped to assert a forfeiture for a breach of a condition in a lease, or he waives his right to such a forfeiture, where after the breach he accepts rent from his tenant with knowledge or full notice thereof. See U.S. Properties, Inc. v. Marwin Corp., Fla.App.1960, 123 So.2d 371, and Tropical Attractions, inc. v. Coppinger, Fla.App.1966, 187 So.2d 395.
The tenant's plaint that he did not receive the three days notice provided in Section 83.20(2), F.S.1969, F.S.A., is without merit. Here the notice was not necessary because the tenant in the lease expressly waived all notice required by law. Such a lease provision takes precedence over the statute. Baker v. Clifford-Mathew Investment Co., 1930, 99 Fla. 1229, 128 So. 827, and Altiere v. Atlantic Nat. Bank of West Palm Beach, Fla.App.1964, 168 So.2d 693.
The...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Raimondi v. I.T. Chips, Inc.
...with knowledge or full notice thereof. Farmers' Bank and Trust Co. v. Palms Pub. Co., 86 Fla. 371, 98 So. 143 (1923); Moskos v. Hand, 247 So.2d 795 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). Even when time is made of the essence of a contract, such provision can also be waived by the party to whom the benefit in......
-
Philpot v. Bouchelle
...with knowledge or full notice thereof. Farmers' Bank and Trust Co. v. Palms Pub. Co., 86 Fla. 371, 98 So. 143 (1923); Moskos v. Hand, 247 So.2d 795 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). Even when time is made of the essence of a contract, such provision can also be waived by the party to whom the benefit in......
-
Amjems, Inc. v. FR Orr Const. Co., Inc.
...1341 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); see also Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. Palms Publishing Co., 86 Fla. 371, 98 So. 143 (1923); Moskos v. Hand, 247 So.2d 795 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). There is no question that Amjems has been in possession of the premises from June 9, 1982 until the present time; nor is th......
-
In re D'Lites of America, Inc.
...waived by the nondefaulting party's failure to take action and continuing acceptance of benefits — e.g. rent payments. Moskos v. Hand, 247 So.2d 795 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1971). It has therefore been stated that Florida law will not allow a termination or forfeiture clause in a lease to be self-......
-
Land mines and other surprises in residential landlord and tenant cases.
...Co., September 24, 1999), cited in Rhoades. (15) TRAWICK, FLORIDA PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE [section] 25-4. (16) E.g., Moskos v. Hand, 247 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1971) (waiver by lease provision); Clark v. Hiett, 495 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1986) (waiver by lease (17) See K.D. Lewis En......