Moss v. State
Decision Date | 17 December 1914 |
Docket Number | 969 |
Citation | 190 Ala. 14,67 So. 431 |
Parties | MOSS v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Criminal Court, Jefferson County; William E. Fort Judge.
J.W Moss was convicted of murder in the first degree, and he appeals. Affirmed.
Prosch & Prosch, of Birmingham, for appellant.
R.C Brickell, Atty. Gen., and T.H. Seay, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
DE GRAFFENRIED, J.
The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree and was sentenced to the penitentiary for life. This appeal is prosecuted by him for the purpose of reversing the judgment of conviction.
1. The theory of the state was that the defendant was guilty of murder, in that he lay in wait for the deceased and shot him inflicting wounds upon him from which he died. Our statute makes this character of homicide murder in the first degree. There was evidence sustaining this theory of the state, and the verdict of the jury indicates that they were satisfied with the truth of that evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.
The theory of the defendant was that he killed the deceased in self-defense. He testified to facts which tended to establish this theory, and there was some evidence tending to corroborate his statements.
A critical examination of this record, however, convinces us that the defendant received in the court below a fair and impartial trial, and we are of the opinion that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed for the reasons set out below.
2. It appears that the deceased came to his death at a late hour in the night. It also appears that prior to the homicide the defendant and the deceased, on this same night, had engaged in two altercations. These altercations probably grew out of the refusal of the defendant to cash a check for the deceased. The last altercation antedated the homicide about fifteen minutes. At the conclusion of the last altercation the parties separated, and about 15 minutes afterwards the defendant shot the deceased while the deceased was walking along a street in Bessemer. The tendencies of the state's evidence were that the defendant concealed himself behind a column and shot the deceased while the deceased was peaceably walking down a street. One of the witnesses for the state described the homicide as follows:
The defendant claims that he killed the deceased while he was being attacked by the deceased and one Will Moose. On that subject he said:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Brown v. State, 6 Div. 238
... ... In Ex ... parte Davis et al., 184 Ala. 26, 63 So. 1010, the Supreme ... Court expressly overruled its holding in the Walker case, ... supra, in reference to this charge. A further treatment of ... the instruction in question was had in Moss v ... State, 190 Ala. 14, 67 So. 431. It now appears with ... authoritative certainty that the charge no longer warrants ... approval. See, Robinson v. State, 243 Ala. 684, 11 ... So.2d 732; Wilson v. State, 243 Ala. 1, 8 So.2d 422; ... Daniels v. State, 243 Ala. 675, 11 So.2d 756; ... ...
-
Baird v. State
...its character, Dudley v. State, 185 Ala. 27, 64 So. 309 [(1914)]; Jackson v. State, 177 Ala. 12, 59 So. 171 [ (1912)]; Moss v. State, 190 Ala. 14, 67 So. 431 [(1914) ]. It is true, however, that where there is an unbroken chain of events beginning with a prior difficulty and leading up to t......
-
Johnson v. State
...character, Dudley v. State, 185 Ala. 27, 64 So. 309 [ (1914) ]; Jackson v. State, 177 Ala. 12, 59 So. 171 [ (1912) ]; Moss v. State, 190 Ala. 14, 67 So. 431 [ (1914) ]. It is true, however, that where there is an unbroken chain of events beginning with a prior difficulty and leading up to t......
-
Johnson v. State, No. CR-99-1349 (AL 3/11/2005)
...its character, Dudley v. State, 185 Ala. 27, 64 So. 309 [(1914)]; Jackson v. State, 177 Ala. 12, 59 So. 171 [(1912]); Moss v. State, 190 Ala. 14, 67 So. 431 [(1914)]. It is true, however, that where there is an unbroken chain of events beginning with a prior difficulty and leading up to the......