Most Worshipful King Solomon Grand Lodge v. Mitchell

Decision Date06 November 1921
Docket Number(No. 6682.)
Citation234 S.W. 687
PartiesMOST WORSHIPFUL KING SOLOMON GRAND LODGE v. MITCHELL et al.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Douglas & Carter, of San Antonio, for plaintiff in error.

Norton & Brown, of San Antonio, for defendants in error.

FLY, C. J.

This suit was instituted by the Most Worshipful King Solomon Grand Ancient Free and Accepted Masons and Queen Esther Grand Chapter Order of the Eastern Star and Daughters of the Sphinx, a negro organization, against C. L. Mitchell, Sterling Williams, I. C. Collins, J. E. Spencer, F. P. Pruitt, and J. W. Williams, in which it was alleged that plaintiff is a corporation organized for the purpose of promoting and extending benevolence, charity and fraternity among its members and to form subordinate lodges and chapters in this state; that the Grand Master is the presiding officer of the Grand Lodge, who is elected annually. It was alleged that N. N. Boozier had been elected Grand Master and others to the other offices, and that they had taken charge of their respective offices, but that Mitchell and some other persons had seceded and set up a body and elected grand officers, Mitchell being Grand Master, Williams, Deputy Grand Master, Spencer, Senior Grand Warden, Pruitt, Grand Junior Warden, Sterling Williams, Grand Secretary, and I. C. Collins Grand Treasurer. The object of the suit was to have an accounting of the money and to recover judgment against each of them for $1,967.40, and that they be enjoined from acting as officers of plaintiff. The defendants filed a long cross-action, which was struck out by the court. The cause was tried without a jury, and judgment rendered that the plaintiff take nothing by its suit, and decreeing that the election of Boozier and others was illegal and void, and that Mitchell and his codefendants were the legal officers. Certain other people were declared to be the officers of the Grand Chapter Order of the Eastern Star and Daughters of the Sphinx. It was also decreed that Boozier, Black, and others were enjoined from representing themselves to be the officers of plaintiff and from...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Industrial Generating Co. v. Jenkins, 11430
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 7 Diciembre 1966
    ...relief must be sought in a court of original jurisdiction. We believe that the language of Chief Justice Fly in Most Worshipful King Solomon Grand Lodge v. Mitchell, 234 S.W. 687, Tex.Civ.App., San Antonio, no writ, where the Court held that one Boozier who had been enjoined from representi......
  • Stark v. Slack
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 10 Noviembre 1921

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT