Moultrie v. State

Citation112 Ga. 121,37 S.E. 122
PartiesMOULTRIE. v. STATE.
Decision Date31 October 1900
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

HOMICIDE—INSTRUCTIONS—EVIDENCE-MUTUAL COMBAT.

1. The provisions of section 73 of the Penal Code should not be given in a charge, in the trial of a murder case, when there is nothing in the evidence or the statement of the accused from which a jury could find that there was a mutual combat between the deceased and the accused. Mell v. State (decided Oct. 30, 1900) 37 S. E. 121, and cases cited.

2. There was in the present case neither direct evidence, nor the proof of any circumstances, nor anything in the statement of the accused, from which a jury would be authorized to find that there was a mutual combat between the deceased and the accused.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from superior court, Chatham county; R. Palligant, Judge.

Jake Moultrie was convicted of homicide, and brings error. Reversed.

Twiggs & Oliver, for plaintiff in error.

W.W. Osborne, Sol. Gen., and J. M. Terrell, Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM. Judgment reversed. All the justices concurring, except LUMPKIN, P. J., and LITTLE, J., absent on account of sickness.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT