Mount Sinai Hospital of Greater Miami, Inc. v. Mora, s. 76--364
| Decision Date | 01 March 1977 |
| Docket Number | Nos. 76--364,76--365,s. 76--364 |
| Citation | 342 So.2d 1063 |
| Parties | MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL OF GREATER MIAMI, INC., Appellant, v. Dr. Rene M. MORA, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Talburt, Kubicki & Bradley and Brett D. Anderson, Jeanne Hayward, Miami, for appellant.
Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Davant, McMath, Tutan & O'Hara and Richard A. Sherman, Thomas & Pearl, Miami, for appellee.
Before HAVERFIELD and HUBBART, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.
On June 3, 1975, Anna Cabal filed an action against Mount Sinai Hospital of Greater Miami, Inc., herein referred to as Mt. Sinai.
On November 21, 1975, Mt. Sinai filed an answer, and separately filed a third party complaint against Dr. Rene M. Mora. In its answer, the defendant hospital denied negligence and pleaded contributory negligence and assumption of risk, and averred that the injurious result alleged by the plaintiff was caused by the negligence of Dr. Mora, his employees and servants.
In the third party complaint filed against Dr. Mora it was alleged that the plaintiff was treated in the hospital by Dr. Mora; that the acts of negligence alleged in the complaint were those of Dr. Mora; and Mt. Sinai prayed that if judgment should be entered against it in the case, judgment be entered on its third party complaint against Dr. Mora for contribution or indemnity.
A motion was filed by Dr. Mora to dismiss Mt. Sinai's third party complaint against him, on the ground that Mt. Sinai had not exhausted its administrative remedy by submitting its claim against Dr. Mora to mediation, pursuant to Section 768.133 Florida Statutes, which now appears as Section 768.44 Florida Statutes, 1976 Supp. A second ground stated in the motion to dismiss was that the court was without jurisdiction to entertain the third party complaint, because it represented a malpractice claim filed in court after July 1, 1975, without prior mediation as provided for by the statute. The motion was granted. Mt. Sinai filed an appeal (No. 76--364) and filed an interlocutory appeal (No. 76--365). Those were consolidated and progressed as a plenary appeal.
Section 768.44 Florida Statutes, 1976 Supp., in subsection(1)(a), provides as follows:
'Any person or his representative claiming damages by reason of injury, death, or monetary loss on account of alleged malpractice by any medical or osteopathic physician, podiatrist, hospital, or health maintenance organization against whom he believes there is a reasonable basis for a claim shall submit such claim to an appropriate medical liability mediation panel before that claim may be filed in any court of this state.'
The above-quoted statutory provision for a person having a medical malpractice claim to submit such claim to a medical liability mediation panel, before an action may be filed thereon, is not applicable to a case instituted before July 1, 1975, by reason of subsection (10) of said Section 768.44, which reads as follows:
'The provisions of subsections (1) through (9) shall not be applicable to any case in which formal suit has been instituted prior to the effective date of those subsections, which shall be July 1, 1975.'
In seeking reversal, the appellant relies on the above-quoted subsection (10) of Section 768.44, contending its third party complaint against Dr. Mora was procedurally authorized, and thus was a part of the 'case' which was exempted from the provisions relating to prior resort to a mediation panel. The appellee contends the third party complaint against Dr. Mora filed after July 1, 1975, was not entitled to be proceeded in as a part of the exempted case without prior submission thereof to a mediation panel.
In evaluating those opposite contentions of the parties, we have been shown no Florida decisions dealing directly with the situation presented here. On consideration thereof, we hold it was error to dismiss the defendant's third party complaint against Dr. Mora for contribution or indemnity.
The filing of the third party complaint by the defendant was procedurally authorized by Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.180. The proceedings thereon, including such judgment as might be rendered on the third party complaint following a judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant Mt. Sinai, would be integral parts of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Duskin v. Duskin
...A.2d 1151, reversed on other grounds, (1979) applying this rule in a statute of limitations context; see also Mt. Sinai Hospital v. Mora, 342 So.2d 1063, 1064 (Fla.App.1977), in which a Florida appellate court found that a third-party complaint filed after the effective date of a malpractic......
-
Attorneys' Title Ins. Fund, Inc. v. Punta Gorda Isles, Inc.
...Fouts, 323 So.2d 593 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); Wallace v. Strassel, 479 So.2d 231 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Petrik; Mount Sinai Hosp. of Greater Miami v. Mora, 342 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Likewise, a claim for indemnity does not accrue until the underlying claim has been paid, but rule 1.180 pe......
-
Fleisher v. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund
...action asserted below. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. v. Zack Co., 374 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Mount Sinai Hospital of Greater Miami, Inc. v. Mora, 342 So.2d 1063, 1065 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). The cases cited by the majority, e.g., New Hampshire Insurance Co. v. Petrik, 343 So.2d 48 (Fla. 1s......
-
Theodorou v. Burling
..."case," used in the Medical Mediation Act. The two terms were defined and used synonomously in Mount Sinai Hospital of Greater Miami, Inc. v. Mora, 342 So.2d 1063, 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) where the court In First National Bank of Miami v. Bebinger, 99 Fla. 1290, 128 So. 862, 683 (1930), it ......