Mountain View Coach Lines, Inc. v. Gehr

Decision Date12 March 1981
Citation80 A.D.2d 949,439 N.Y.S.2d 632
PartiesMOUNTAIN VIEW COACH LINES, INC., Appellant, v. Marilyn GEHR, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

George A. Roland, Albany, for appellant. Hesson, Ford, Sherwood & Whalen, Albany (Dale Thuillez, Albany, of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from so much of a judgment of the County Court of Green County (Battisti, Jr., J.), entered April 10, 1980, which dismissed that part of the complaint seeking damages for loss of use of plaintiff's vehicle. The plaintiff Mountain View Coach Lines, Inc. commenced this action for property damage it sustained on September 9, 1976 when one of its commercial buses was damaged in an accident with an automobile operated by defendant Marilyn Gehr. At an examination before trial, plaintiff's employee testified that a spare bus was used while the damaged vehicle was being repaired and that all bus routes were maintained during the period of repair. Plaintiff concedes that a replacement vehicle was not hired and that loss of profits or diminution of services to customers were not incurred during the period the bus was being repaired. In Mountain View Coach Lines v. Harnett, 99 Misc.2d 271, 415 N.Y.S.2d 918, affd. 69 A.D.2d 1020, 414 N.Y.S.2d 947, as amd. 70 A.D.2d 977, mot. for lv. to app. den. 47 N.Y.2d 710, 419 N.Y.S.2d 1026, 393 N.E.2d 1050, a case factually identical to this matter, we affirmed a judgment of the County Court of Greene County which dismissed the plaintiff's complaint insofar as it sought the reasonable rental value for loss of use of its bus during repair. Accordingly, the instant judgment must be affirmed. Judgment affirmed, without costs.

MAHONEY, P. J., and SWEENEY, KANE, CASEY and WEISS, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Mahar v. US XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of New York
    • 24 February 2010
    ...West v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 167 F.3d 776, 779 (2d Cir.1999) (citation omitted). 11 Compare Mountain View Coach Lines, Inc. v. Gehr, 80 A.D.2d 949, 439 N.Y.S.2d 632 (3d Dep't 1981) (dismissing claim for loss of use where plaintiff did not hire a replacement vehicle and did not incur ......
  • Mountain View Coach Lines, Inc. v. Storms
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 18 June 1984
    ...damages are recoverable in such circumstances and decline to follow two Third Department cases to the contrary (Mountain View Coach Lines v. Gehr, 80 A.D.2d 949, 439 N.Y.S.2d 632; Mountain View Coach Lines v. Hartnett, 99 Misc.2d 271, 415 N.Y.S.2d 918, affd. 69 A.D.2d 1020, 414 N.Y.S.2d 947......
  • Kuwait Airways v. Ogden Allied Aviation Services
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 30 November 1989
    ...Department—without citing either K.L.M. or the line of authority on which K.L.M. had relied—in Mountain View Coach Lines, Inc. v. Gehr, 80 A.D.2d 949, 439 N.Y.S.2d 632 (3d Dept.1981) (Mem.), "a case factually identical" to Gehr and Hartnett proved critical to the decision in CTI Internation......
  • CTI Intern., Inc. v. Lloyds Underwriters, 471
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • 16 May 1984
    ...evidence defeated the same operator's claim for loss of use damages in another case two years later. Mountain View Coach Lines, Inc. v. Gehr, 80 A.D.2d 949, 439 N.Y.S.2d 632 (3d Dep't 1981). See generally 18 A.L.R.2d 497, 524, 528-36 These decisions make clear, contrary to what KLM anticipa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT