Moushegian v. Sheppard
Decision Date | 07 April 1932 |
Citation | 279 Mass. 49,180 N.E. 619 |
Parties | MOUSHEGIAN v. SHEPPARD. |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal and Report from Probate Court, Middlesex County; Collen C. Campbell, Judge.
Petition by Garabed N. Moushegian against William T. Sheppard, executor of the will of Ellen M. Holden, deceased, for services rendered. From a decree dismissing the petition, petitioner appeals.
Reversed and rendered.
R. B. Walsh and F. F. O'Donnell, both of Lowell, for appellant.
M. J. Cohen, of Lowell, for appellee.
This is a petition filed in the probate court by an attorney at law under G. L. c. 215, § 39, for services alleged to have been rendered in connection with the administration of the estate of a deceased person. From a decree dismissing the petition the petitioner appealed.
The statute was first enacted in 1915 (St. 1915, c. 151, § 6). The part material to this case is in these words: ‘Probate courts may ascertain and determine the amount due any person * * * for services rendered by any person in connection with the administration of the estate of a deceased person * * * and payment of said amount when ascertained and determined to be due may be enforced summarily by said court upon motion of the person to whom the amount is due in the same manner as a like payment under a decree in equity may be enforced, and execution may also be issued therefor against the executor * * * personally as upon a judgment at law.’
The judge of probate made a report of facts in the following terms:
G. L. c. 206, § 16, provides: ‘An executor, administrator, guardian, conservator or trustee shall be allowed his reasonable expenses incurred in the execution of his trust, and shall have such compensation for services as the court may allow.’ Under G. L. c....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
King v. Grace
...allowance to the accountant of a single sum was rightly made. Tomlinson v. Flanagan, 287 Mass. 38, 46, 190 N.E. 785;Moushegian v. Sheppard, 279 Mass. 49, 53, 180 N.E. 619. It is not necessary to examine one by one the requests for rulings presented by the contestants. Whatever error may be ......
-
McLaughlin v. Old Colony Trust Co.
...including a settlement made with heirs who had appeared in opposition to the allowance of Mrs. Morrison's will. Moushegian v. Sheppard, 279 Mass. 49, 180 N.E. 619. The judge fixed the total value of the petitioners' services at $30,000, and from a decree for payment of the unpaid balance of......
-
McLaughlin v. Old Colony Trust Co.
...39 is in the nature of an alternative to an action at law against the executor. Ginzberg v. Wyman, 272 Mass. 499 , 501. Moushegian v. Sheppard, 279 Mass. 49, 54. It that the amount of the petitioner's compensation is to be determined as if an action at law had been brought and not according......
-
Culhane v. Foley
...executor of the will of Kate S. Gallaher, in connection with the administration of her estate, to be the amount of $12,000. Moushegian v. Sheppard, 279 Mass. 49 . respondent appealed. The judge made no report of facts. The evidence, however, is reported. The petitioner contends that the fai......