Moye v. State

Decision Date17 January 1928
Docket Number3 Div. 568
Citation22 Ala.App. 456,117 So. 153
PartiesMOYE et al. v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

Rehearing Denied May 8, 1928

Appeal from Circuit Court, Conecuh County; C.E. Hamilton, Special Judge.

Willis Moye and others were convicted of assault and battery, and they appeal. Affirmed.

Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Moye v. State, 117 So 154.

Bricken P.J., dissenting on rehearing.

Hybart Hare & Dickey, of Evergreen, for appellants.

Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.

SAMFORD, J.

The only question of merit appearing in this record is the action of the court in overruling defendant's motion for a new trial upon the ground that the bloody clothes worn by the party assaulted at the time of the assault were introduced in evidence and permitted to remain before the jury during the trial. It is insisted that these bloody clothes were but the presentation of an unsightly spectacle calculated to prejudice the jury. This insistence finds some semblance of support in Boyette v. State, 215 Ala. 472, 110 So. 812; but we do not think this case is controlled by the Boyette Case, supra. There the clothes added nothing to the evidence in aid of a verdict. Here the question was as to the gravity of the offense and the severity of the punishment to be fixed by the jury. The clothes, covered with blood as a direct result of the battery, and worn by the assaulted party at the time he was assaulted, were a part of the res gestae tending to disclose the severity of the assault. It having been shown that the clothes were the same and were in the same condition as when taken off of the assaulted party immediately after the assault, they were admissible in evidence. That in addition to the above the clothes presented a gruesome spectacle does not render them inadmissible.

We think the law is correctly stated in Hyche v. State (Ala.App.) 113 So. 644.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.

On Rehearing.

PER CURIAM.

Rehearing denied.

BRICKEN P.J. (dissenting).

The foregoing opinion is in direct conflict with the decision in Boyette v. State, 215 Ala. 472, 110 So. 812, and with the case of Hyche v. State (Ala.App.) 113 So. 644, as well as with the following opinions of the Supreme Court, covering a period of many years: Holley v. State, 75 Ala. 14; Watkins v. State, 89 Ala. 82, 8 So. 134; Mitchell v. State, 94 Ala. 68, 10 So. 518; Dorsey v. State, 107 Ala. 157, 18 So. 199; Stevens Case, 133 Ala. 28, 32 So. 270; Andrews v. State, 159 Ala. 14, 48 So. 858; Barnett v. State, 165 Ala. 59, 51 So. 299; Pate v. State, 150 Ala. 10, 43 So. 343. See, also, other authorities cited in the case of Boyette v. State, supra, and of Hyche v. State, supra.

The undisputed evidence in this case shows conclusively that the injury complained of was inflicted upon the head of the alleged injured party, that a scalp wound only was inflicted and that no part of the clothing worn by the alleged injured party at the time of the injury was perforated or punctured, or otherwise injured, except by the blood from the wound. ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • McNutt v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • 5 February 1929
    ... ... was without error. The shirt had been properly identified, a ... portion thereof (the collar) was perforated by the bullets ... which took the life of Pruitt, and thus under nearly all of ... the decisions was admissible in evidence. Certainly so under ... the rule laid down in Moye et al. v. State (Ala ... App.) 117 So. 153. Certiorari denied Id., 217 Ala. 561, ... 117 So. 154. But see Hyche v. State, 22 Ala. App ... 176, 113 So. 644 ... The ... remaining question on this appeal relates to the ruling of ... the court which, in effect, held, as a matter of ... ...
  • Patterson v. State, 7 Div. 583.
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • 18 February 1930
    ... ... by the bullets from defendant's pistol. The Boyette Case, ... 215 Ala. 472, 110 So. 812, has been limited and explained by ... later decisions. Hyche v. State, 22 Ala. App. 176, ... 113 So. 644; Id., 217 Ala. 114, 114 So. 906; Moye v ... State, 22 Ala. App. 456, 117 So. 153; Id., 217 Ala. 561, ... 117 So. 154 ... For the ... errors pointed out the judgment is reversed, and the cause is ... remanded ... Reversed ... and ... ...
  • Long v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • 7 February 1950
  • Stephenson v. State, 3 Div. 806.
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • 17 January 1939
    ... ... sustain the contention of appellant in his insistence of ... error, we are cited to the case of Boyette v. State, ... 215 Ala. 472, 110 So. 812. The distinction between cases ... similar to the Boyette Case, supra, and cases similar to the ... one at bar, is well drawn in Moye v. State, 22 ... Ala.App. 456, 117 So. 153; Moye v. State, 217 Ala ... 561, 117 So. 154; Hyche v. State, 22 Ala.App. 176, ... 113 So. 644, and numerous other cases noted in Shepard's ... Alabama Citations, pages 180-472 ... It ... follows, therefore, that the admission of the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT