Mt. Marion Coal Mining Co. v. Holt
Decision Date | 13 March 1909 |
Citation | 118 S.W. 825 |
Parties | MT. MARION COAL MINING CO. v. HOLT et al.<SMALL><SUP>†</SUP></SMALL> |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Palo Pinto County; W. J. Oxford, Judge.
Action by Mrs. Ella Holt and others against the Mt. Marion Coal Mining Company. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Reversed and rendered.
John W. Wray, for appellant. W. P. Gibbs, A. Stevenson, and E. B. Ritchie, for appellees.
Appellee Mrs. Ella Holt is the surviving wife, and the remaining appellees are the surviving children, of James Holt, who on about April 30, 1904, fell into one of appellant's mining shafts, and as a result thereof was killed. They recovered a judgment in the sum of $4,500, from which this appeal has been prosecuted.
Substantially the only question presented to us is the sufficiency of the evidence to authorize the submission of the case to the jury. Appellees thus state the evidence upon which the judgment rests:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. High
...S.W. 817; Price v. Houston Direct Navigation Co., 46 Tex. 535; Canode v. Sewell (Tex.Civ.App.) 172 S.W. 142; Mt. Marion Coal Mining Co. v. Holt, 54 Tex. Civ.App. 411, 118 S.W. 825; Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Cumpston, 4 Tex.Civ.App. 25, 23 S.W. 47; Truelson v. Whitney & Bodden Shipping Co. (C.C.......
-
Freeman v. Powell
...rule, we think it is not to be doubted from the unquestioned facts that appellee did assume the risk. See Mt. Marion Coal Mining Co. v. Holt, 54 Tex. Civ. App. 411, 118 S. W. 825; Choctaw, O. & G. R. Co. v. McDade, 191 U. S. 64, 24 Sup. Ct. 24, 48 L. Ed. 100. But it is insisted that the cou......
-
Hutcherson v. Amarillo St. Ry. Co.
...37 Tex. Civ. App. 216, 83 S. W. 404; Ladonia Cotton Oil Co. v. Shaw, 27 Tex. Civ. App. 65, 65 S. W. 693; Mt. Marion Coal Mining Co. v. Ella Holt, 54 Tex. Civ. App. 413, 118 S. W. 825, writ of error denied by Supreme Court; Railway Co. v. Peden, 32 Tex. Civ. App. 315, 74 S. W. 932, writ of e......
-
Snipes v. Bomar Cotton Oil Co.
...be, he would be held to have assumed the risk of the situation so known to him, and appellants are without right to recover. Coal Co. v. Holt, 118 S. W. 825; Railway Co. v. Hynson, 101 Tex. 543, 109 S. W. 929; Oil Co. v. Stubblefield, 115 S. W. 626; Railway Co. v. French, 86 Tex. 96, 23 S. ......