Mullins v. Mt. St. Mary's Cemetery Ass'n
Decision Date | 23 June 1914 |
Docket Number | No. 18025.,18025. |
Citation | 168 S.W. 685,259 Mo. 142 |
Parties | MULLINS v. MT. ST. MARY'S CEMETERY ASS'N et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; Wm. O. Thomas, Judge.
Action by W. C. Mullins against the Mt. St. Mary's Cemetery Association and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Reversed and remanded.
See, also, 239 Mo. 681, 144 S. W. 109.
This is a suit on a special tax bill, in which judgment went for the defendant. The petition was filed July 24, 1907, and is in two counts based on special tax bills for the construction of sewers. The first count is on a bill for $17,598.28, dated October 12, 1904. It is payable in four annual installments, beginning May 31, 1905. It bears 7 per cent. interest, with the provision that, if there is default in the payment of any of the installments, the whole shall become due, and bear 10 per cent. from the date of the tax bill. The second count is on a bill for $1,531.71, dated September 1, 1905, bearing interest at 10 per cent. per annum. Both said bills are against the land included in Mt. St. Mary's Cemetery, in Kansas City, containing about 35 acres.
The answer admits that the defendant owned the land, and alleges that it holds the land as trustee for the improvement of Mt. St. Mary's Cemetery, of which said land is a part, and also for certain orphan asylums of Kansas City, except such portions or lots thereof as it has sold and conveyed for burial lots. It alleges that the land described is a public cemetery, 35 acres in area, not connected in any way with the sewer or sewers for the construction of which said tax bills are alleged to have been issued, and that in building said sewers there was no provision made by which drains on said land should be connected with said sewers, and that said cemetery lands derive no benefit whatever from said sewers, and that the tax bills equal or exceed the total value of the land; that for said reasons the ordinances authorizing the issuance of the tax bills in this suit are void, because they are fraudulent and oppressive; and that the enforcement of the tax bills in this suit would constitute a taking under the guise of taxation of the private property of the defendant for public use without any compensation, and is in violation, therefore, of sections 20, 21, and 30 of article 2 of the Constitution of the state, and also in violation of the fourteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States. There is no allegation that the plaintiff knew of or was a party to such fraud.
It alleges that the cemetery grounds have been duly platted into lots, and the plats thereof filed in the office of the recorder of deeds of Jackson county, Mo.; that many of said lots have been sold and conveyed to persons who are now the beneficial owners, and that the act of the Kansas City board of public works in apportioning the special taxes for the construction of said sewer against the 35-acre cemetery tract as one lot was in violation of article 8, § 7, of the charter of Kansas City, Mo.
The reply was a general denial.
A jury was waived by the parties, and the trial was before the court. The plaintiff introduced the tax bills in evidence. The defendant introduced in evidence its charter and articles of association, dated December 24, 1898; also its by-laws, which included the following:
Said cemetery was originally laid out in 1877 by a corporation under the same name as that of the defendant and of which the defendant seems to be merely a continuation. Prior to such incorporation in 1898 the deeds made by the cemetery corporation to the lot holders contained the words "grant, bargain, and sell" in the granting clause, and also had the following clause:
"To have and to hold the same unto the said party of the second part, his heirs and assigns, only as a place of burial, subject, however, to the conditions, stipulations, and regulations hereto annexed and made part of this deed, and which are the conditions upon which this deed is made," followed by a clause of general warranty.
The annexed stipulations and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United Cemeteries Co. v. Strother, 33497.
... ... Mullins v. Mt. Saint Mary's Cemetery Assn., 259 Mo. 142, 168 S.W. 685; Baker v ... ...
-
Abrams v. Scott
... ... Louis County, Missouri, Respondents, Lakewood Park Cemetery Association, Defendant-Appellant No. 40397Supreme Court of MissouriApril ... 41 C.J., p. 767, sec. 853, p. 763, ... sec. 844; Holy Ghost Assn. v. Felig, 72 Mo.App. 473 ... (8) This case was remanded generally so ... the cemetery. Mullins v. Mount St. Mary's Cemetery ... Assn., 259 Mo. 142. (12) Each lot owner ... ...
-
Troost Ave. Cemetery Co. v. Kansas City
...Sec. 300; Allison v. Cemetery Co., 283 Mo. 424; Barrie v. Richmond Cemetery, 221 Mo.App. 708; Mullins v. Cemetery Assn., 239 Mo. 681, 259 Mo. 142, 268 Mo. 691; Pennoyer v. Neff, U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565; State ex rel. v. Blair, 238 Mo. 132. The cemetery company had the legal right (before the......
-
Abrams v. Lakewood Park Cemetery Ass'n
... ... of foreclosure. National Cemetery Assn. v. Benson, ... 344 Mo. 784, 129 S.W.2d 842; Wood-lawn Cemetery v ... Inhabitants of Everett, ... Kansas City Charter of 1908. But we do not think so, for the ... Mullins cases ( Mullins v. Mount St. Mary's ... Cemetery, 239 Mo. 681, 144 S.W. 109; 259 Mo. 142, 168 ... ...