Munn v. North Carolina State University
| Decision Date | 03 March 2006 |
| Docket Number | No. 567A05.,567A05. |
| Citation | 626 S.E.2d 270 |
| Parties | Harry E. MUNN, Jr. v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY. |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 617 S.E.2d 335 (2005), vacating an order denying plaintiff's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial entered 19 December 2003 by Judge J.B. Allen, Jr. in Superior Court, Wake County, and remanding for a new trial on damages only. On 3 November 2005, the Supreme Court allowed defendant's petition for discretionary review as to additional issues. Heard in the Supreme Court 15 February 2006.
Unti & Lumsden, L.L.P., by Michael L. Unti and Sharon L. Smith, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellee.
Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by John P. Scherer II and Kimberly D. Potter, Assistant Attorneys General, for defendant-appellant.
As to the issue on direct appeal, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion. Further, we conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.
REVERSED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Keith v. Health-Pro Home Care Servs., Inc.
-
Stann v. Levine
...350 N.C. 64, 65, 511 S.E.2d 298, 299 (1999)), reh'g denied, 359 N.C. 643, 617 S.E.2d 662 (2005); see also Munn v. N.C. State Univ., 360 N.C. 353, 626 S.E.2d 270 (2006), rev'g per curiam for reasons stated in 173 N.C.App. 144, 150, 617 S.E.2d 335, 339 (2005) (Jackson, J., dissenting). In Via......
-
McKinley Bldg. Corp. v. Alvis
.... . . his appeal must be dismissed for failure to follow our mandatory Rules of Appellate Procedure."), rev'd per curiam, 360 N.C. 353, 626 S.E.2d 270 (2006); see Jones, ___ N.C.App. at ___, 638 S.E.2d at 228-29 (Dismissing assignments of error in part for failure to include specific record......
-
State v. Hart
...the appellant and addressed issues not raised or argued. We also addressed appellate rules violations in Munn v. N.C. State Univ., 360 N.C. 353, 626 S.E.2d 270 (2006) (per curiam) rev'g 173 N.C.App. 144, 617 S.E.2d 335 (2005). In Munn v. North Carolina State University, 173 N.C.App. 144, 61......