Murphy v. Holliway et al.
Decision Date | 01 April 1929 |
Docket Number | No. 16399.,16399. |
Citation | 16 S.W.2d 107 |
Parties | P.I. MURPHY, APPELLANT, v. W.W. HOLLIWAY AND OTHERS, RESPONDENTS. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Atchison County. — Hon. John M. Dawson, Judge.
REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART AND IN PART AFFIRMED.
Edwin A. Austin and Lee Mullins for appellant.
W.C. Ellison, L.D. Ramsay, Henry B. Hunt and James F. Gore for respondent.
This is an action for the purchase price of 510 opera chairs sold and delivered to defendant by the Peabody School Furniture Company, of Topeka, Kansas. The plaintiff is the president and the assignee of that company. The evidence shows that the defendants, with the exception of William R. Erwin, are members of a committee known as the Atchison County Memorial Building Committee, an unincorporated voluntary association. The county court of Atchison county had made an appropriation under the provisions of an act of the Missouri Legislature, Laws of Mo., 1919, p. 78, for the purpose of erecting a memorial building in memory of the World War soldiers and sailors. This appropriation was not sufficient to pay for the proposed building; so the county court appointed a committee to build and equip the building and to raise money for that purpose, but gave the committee no authority to incur any indebtedness on behalf of the county. The building was constructed and equipped, largely by use of means raised by popular subscription. When the equipment of the building was under consideration, one R.C. Everett called at the town of Rockport and succeeded in getting the greater number of the committee together, at which time he took a tentative order for 427 opera chairs at the price of $3.32 each. The members of the committee present authorized defendant George Boettner to sign the order as secretary of the committee. The order was written upon an order blank placed over two duplicate blanks with carbon paper between; so that in writing the one order three copies were made. The blank form was evidently prepared primarily for taking orders from school boards. The original order was forwarded to the Peabody School Furniture Company and one of the carbon copies was left with the secretary of the committee. Several members of the committee read the order before the secretary signed it, and according to the defendants' evidence the salesman read the order in the presence of all the members of the committee who attended the meeting. However, one of defendants' witnesses said that he did not know whether all of the order was read or not. When the original order was received by the furniture company it was in words and figures as follows:
At the trial the defendants introduced in evidence the carbon copy which was left with the secretary, and the words which we have italicized, namely: the words "before next June" and the words "approximately 1476.64" were not on the copy. As part of the order was printed and part was written in pencil, we reproduce the printed blank which was used in taking the order.
The plaintiff's petition was in three counts. The first count alleged that plaintiff is the assignee of the Peabody School Furniture Company, a corporation; that defendants constituted a voluntary, unincorporated association, of which George Boettner was secretary; that the furniture company sent its traveling salesman to attend a meeting of the committee and furnished him with printed blank forms of orders; that the committee by unanimous order of all the defendants as such committee purchased from the furniture company 510 opera chairs at the agreed price of $3.32 each, and that defendant Boettner as secretary of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Dubinsky
... ... 2 C ... J. 562, sec. 204; Burnett v. Royal Union Mut. Life Ins ... Co., 112 S.W.2d 134; Murphy v. Holliway, 16 ... S.W.2d 107. (9) Where the answer to an action at law sets up ... an equitable defense and prays for affirmative relief, the ... ...
-
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Langer
... ... Stone v. Guth, 232 Mo.App. 217, 102 S.W.2d 738; Murphy v. Holliway, 223 Mo.App. 714, 16 S.W.2d 107; Meriwether v. Atkin, 137 Mo. App. 32, 119 S.W. 36; Richmond v. Judy, 6 Mo.App. 465; Ferris v. Thaw, 5 ... ...
- Murphy v. Holliway
-
Kratchman v. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co., Ltd., of England
... ... Ambiguity in written contract (removal permit) does not open ... door for parol evidence, except for purpose of explaining ... ambiguity. Murphy v. Holliway et al., (K. C. App.) ... 16 S.W. 2d 107, l. c. 114 (15-17); Wood v. Utter, 77 ... S.W. 2d 832, l. c. 835 (1-2). Principal may ... ...